Wednesday, October 31, 2012

FOXNews.com: Dems push climate change issue in wake of Sandy, but some scientists skeptical

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dems push climate change issue in wake of Sandy, but some scientists skeptical
Nov 1st 2012, 02:29

As the East Coast grapples with the fallout of Hurricane Sandy, Democrats are sounding the alarm over climate change, suggesting that carbon pollution played a role in bringing about the deadly storm.

"Hurricane Sandy is exactly the type of extreme weather event that climate scientists have said will become more frequent and more severe if we fail to reduce our carbon pollution," Democratic Reps. Henry Waxman of California and Bobby Rush of Illinois wrote in a letter Wednesday to Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Waxman and Rush called on Upton to convene a lame-duck congressional hearing on the matter, accusing Republicans of ignoring the issue.

"For two years, the House of Representatives has pretended that climate change is not happening and that the consequences can be dismissed without concern," they wrote.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo cited climate change in a press briefing earlier this week, arguing that, "Anyone who says there's not a dramatic change in weather patterns, I think, is denying reality."

But scientists say the evidence is far less concrete than the politicians appear to believe.

Martin Hoerling, a meteorologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Sandy wasn't boosted by global warming -- the storm merely revealed natural forces at work.

"Great events can have little causes," he told the New York Times. "In this case, the immediate cause is most likely little more that the coincidental alignment of a tropical storm with an extratropical storm."

The climate change debate has been absent from the campaign trail this year as economic recovery and foreign policy have dominated the headlines. But with Sandy's unprecedented devastation – leaving New York City subways flooded and ravaging coastal towns throughout New Jersey – activists are hoping to yet again spotlight the issue.

The office of Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman sent a note to reporters reminding them of a previous hearing on the threat of rising sea levels to domestic infrastructure.

"When sea levels rise, the storm surge associated with extreme storms gets even worse," Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat, said at the April hearing. "These impacts … are not theoretical and they are not disputed and they are not in the distant future."

As for Sandy, Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist with Canada's University of Victoria, said climate change didn't make an ordinary storm extraordinary.

"The ingredients of this storm seem a little bit cooked by climate change, but the overall storm is difficult to attribute to global warming," Weaver told the Associated Press.

But the science is anything but clear cut. Michael Mann, a Penn State University scientist who has been studying the climate for decades, said that ocean waters were about 1 degree warmer thanks to manmade climate change, one factor that clearly caused Sandy to swell.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Iowa joins Texas, tells international poll watchers: Don't mess with us

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Iowa joins Texas, tells international poll watchers: Don't mess with us
Nov 1st 2012, 02:06

Iowa has joined Texas in cautioning international poll watchers against getting too close to the voting sites next week – warning that anyone who breaks state law by doing so can be arrested.

The warning to monitors from the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe came in a statement this week by Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz. He said he welcomes the monitors to Iowa, but he warned against trying to "gain access" to Iowa polling sites on Election Day.

"My office met with two delegation representatives last week to discuss Iowa's election process, and it was explained to them that they are not permitted at the polls," Schultz said. "Iowa law is very specific about who is permitted at polling places, and there is no exception for members of this group."

Schultz went on to say that Iowa law "states that poll workers 'shall order the arrest' of any persons violating these provisions."

While the United States is one of dozens of members of the OSCE, the Iowa warning was similar to one issued last week by Texas officials. The group has sent monitors to U.S. polling sites since 2002 -- but this year, Texas took exception to what officials perceived as a challenge to the latest wave of voter ID laws. 

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, in a letter to the OSCE, threatened to prosecute any observer who breaks state law by getting too close to any polling site. 

"The OSCE may be entitled to its opinions about Voter ID laws, but your opinion is legally irrelevant in the United States," he wrote. He went on to remind representatives that they are not allowed to enter a polling place, and cautioned against going within 100 feet of the entrance.

The letter touched off a flurry of testy tweets and correspondence that brought in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to play ref. Janez Lenarcic, director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, fired off a letter to Clinton to complain -- which was followed by a letter from Abbott to Clinton reiterating his concerns. 

"The threat of criminal sanctions against OSCE/ODIHR observers is unacceptable," Lenarcic said in a statement. "The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections." 

OSCE officials say they plan to adhere to state laws while in the U.S.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland on Thursday acknowledged Clinton had received letters from both sides and tried to offer assurances.

She said the plan to send observers "isn't any different" from past years. 

South Carolina Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said Friday that the OSCE observers are also expected to come to his state, where officials have pushed a similar voter ID law that is not yet in effect. But Whitmire said South Carolina does not share Texas' concerns. 

"Whoever wants to come observe South Carolina elections, we welcome them," he told FoxNews.com. "We want our election to be as open as possible."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Complaints crop up in Ohio of early voting machines marking Romney votes for Obama

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Complaints crop up in Ohio of early voting machines marking Romney votes for Obama
Nov 1st 2012, 02:57

Early voting problems in the key battleground state of Ohio are fueling concerns in the final days until Election Day, with the national race essentially tied in the latest Fox News poll.

After several early voters in North Carolina said last week they cast ballots for Mitt Romney but the electronic ballot machine logged their pick as President Obama, similar problems have popped up this week in Ohio.

Voters said they selected Romney on the touch screen but an Obama vote was logged instead.

"You want to vote for who you want to vote for, and when you can't it's irritating," Ohio voter Joan Steven told the Marion Star.

As with the North Carolina cases, election officials had the machine inspected and re-calibrated.

Ohio is widely said to the be the most sought-after state in the two campaign's electoral pathway to the White House because of its 18 electoral votes and nearly even split between Obama and Romney, though Obama has held onto a slight lead in recent polls.

The Fox News poll released Wednesday showed the national matchup tied at 46 percent.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Romney campaign tries to put Obama on defense by expanding electoral map

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Romney campaign tries to put Obama on defense by expanding electoral map
Nov 1st 2012, 01:00

As the presidential campaigns slowly kicked back into gear Wednesday in the wake of monster storm Sandy, Mitt Romney and allied groups were making a late play for ostensibly Democratic-leaning states – in a move to expand the map that would have been unthinkable just a few months ago.

Obama campaign officials, sounding a confident note despite fluctuating poll numbers, dismissed the activity as "desperate." They claimed the Romney team was getting nervous about its chances of winning the vital battleground of Ohio and was "throwing out lifelines" to create a firewall.

Obama, before heading back out on the campaign trail, spent Wednesday afternoon touring storm-ravaged New Jersey with Republican Gov. Chris Christie and offering assurances to residents that the federal government would cut through the "red tape" to help those affected.

But on the sidelines, both campaigns were engaged in some heavy and heated strategizing around the electoral math.

Recent polling shows Obama with a slight edge in Ohio, but the race remains a dead heat and Romney advisers continued to express confidence about their chances there. Meanwhile, efforts by the Romney campaign to compete in states thought to lean Obama could in fact create multiple pathways to the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency.

A Fox News poll released Wednesday showed the national race tied at 46 percent each.

The electoral path, for months now, had been very narrow for Romney and in almost every case ran through Ohio. But fresh polls reflect a tightening race in several states Obama won handily in 2008.

"A lot of these states, it's very close. … But I think where we feel most confident is that we're playing offense with the map whereas they're playing defense," Romney senior adviser Kevin Madden said Wednesday, pointing to states like Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Michigan as new battlegrounds.

The Romney-aligned super PAC Restore Our Future on Wednesday launched a $1.8 million ad buy in Minnesota and New Mexico. "The Romney momentum is growing and the electoral field keeps expanding," Charlie Spies, the super PAC's treasurer, said in a statement.

Spies noted that the Obama campaign is also advertising in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while dispatching former President Bill Clinton to Minnesota on Tuesday. Romney spokesman Ryan Williams called the movement a sign that Obama is "playing defense" in traditionally blue states.

A Detroit News poll this week showed Obama up by just 3 points in Michigan, a state worth 16 electoral votes. Polls also show the race tightening in Minnesota, worth 10 electoral votes. And the once-blue state of Wisconsin, worth 10 electoral votes, has long been a hard-fought battleground, considering Republican running mate Paul Ryan's roots in the state and a now-active Republican voter base energized by recent fights over collective bargaining.

But it is the play for Pennsylvania that could have the most impact. The Keystone State is worth 20 electoral votes, more than Ohio's 18.

The Romney campaign this week started pouring money into Pennsylvania ad buys, while a Franklin & Marshall College poll showed Obama with a 4-point lead there – down from a 9-point lead in September.

"Pennsylvania presents a unique opportunity for the Romney campaign," Romney political director Rich Beeson said in a memo this week.

He noted that below the presidential level, the state has been voting Republican in recent contests – electing a Republican governor and U.S. senator.

"The western part of the Keystone State has become more conservative (and President Obama's war on coal is very unpopular there), and Mitt Romney is more competitive in the voter-rich Philadelphia suburbs than any Republican nominee since 1988. This makes Pennsylvania a natural next step as we expand the playing field," Beeson wrote.

Top Obama advisers, though, dismissed the talk of expanding the map as just that – talk.

Adviser David Axelrod, on MSNBC Wednesday morning, pledged to shave off his distinctive mustache if the campaign loses Pennsylvania, Michigan or Minnesota.

He and Obama campaign manager Jim Messina described the latest super PAC ad buys as a sign of weakness and described Romney's supposed surge as "faux-mentum." Further, they said the latest Detroit News poll on Michigan does not square with their internal numbers.

While Romney is trying to expand the map, recent polling also shows North Carolina – a state that has mostly favored Romney – tightening a bit. RealClearPolitics last week threw North Carolina into the toss-up column on its electoral map.

Romney on Wednesday spent the day in Florida, another state vital to his electoral-vote strategy.

Romney began a Tampa rally by asking Americans to help the storm victims, then resumed his argument that he can improve the country's bleak economic situation.

"This (election) should be a turning point," Romney said. "Twenty three million Americans are still struggling to find a job. ... This hasn't happened in American history."

Obama is expected to return to the campaign trail Thursday with stops in the battleground states of Colorado, Nevada and Wisconsin.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Auto industry touted by Obama still rubs some industry retirees the wrong way

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Auto industry touted by Obama still rubs some industry retirees the wrong way
Oct 31st 2012, 23:21

President Obama never fails to mention the billions in federal dollars pumped into the U.S. auto industry when campaigning in Ohio.

At a recent campaign stop in Dayton, the president describes the bailout this way: "I bet on American workers. I bet on American manufacturing. I would do it again because that bet has paid off for Ohio and for America in a big way."

Former Delphi plant manager Tom Rose has a different opinion about the bailout: "It's good press. It's good politics, but it's only one side of the story."

Rose and tens of thousands of other Delphi retirees were nervous in 2009 when the company was trudging its way through bankruptcy. So a lot of questions were asked, like how's our pension looking?

The answer, says Rose, was a thumbs-up from management, which said the pension was well funded.

And then, it wasn't.

Delphi abruptly cancelled its employee pensions and turned over what remained in them to the federal government to administer.

It was the nightmare scenario for Delphi retirees. The monthly payments that were to be their financial bedrock through retirement years were slashed. The cuts were staggering, ranged from 30 to 70 percent.

After 39 years on the job, Rose's pension was clipped 40 percent.

"You spend years and years making your financial plan for your retirement ... and going through all the numbers," Rose said, "and it gets taken away from you in a heartbeat. ... and I feel absolutely betrayed."

But it was at this time that a floundering General Motors was seeking emergency help from the federal government. The company was in needs of billions. Chrysler was also at the White House door looking for assistance.

The Obama administration was willing but demanded a rapid restructuring of the companies. Typically, in these kinds of bankruptcies or bankruptcy-like circumstances, concessions are made or financial commitments are broken. But what GM needed besides the infusion of cash from the federal government was labor peace.

Any deal between the U.S. government and GM was not binding on the United Auto Workers. That gave the union leverage. What it wanted was its retired Delphi members taken care of.

GM already had an agreement with the UAW to "top-off" its union pensions at Delphi, if that company went into bankruptcy.

Steven Rattner, point-man for the White House on the bailout, notes that these types of side agreements typically get tossed out in bankruptcies. To Rattner, it was important for
GM to honor the side-deal about Delphi members.

"It was not easy to decide where to draw the line," says Rattner, "but ultimately we decided that GM should honor its prior agreement (with the UAW)."

But that was it. Salaried Delphi retiree pensions were not made whole. The 20,000 who had banked their future on their pensions were left to figure it out on their own.

Tom Rose thinks he knows why. "The union had political connections and we did not," he said.

In Rose's opinion, and that of many more salaried Delphi retirees, the pension decision was a political payoff. It was nothing more than a Democratic president and his administration taking care of an ally, organized labor.

Rattner insists that not the case.

"We had lots of discussions about whether to top off all of the pensions," Rattner said.

It came down to necessity. Rattner says GM could not survive without people on the floors of the factories working. That and the side agreement with the UAW cinched it.

To Rose, it all comes down to fairness.

"You've got two groups of employees working for the same company that are in the identical situation and yet they are treated distinctly different by our own federal government," he said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Exclusive: Classified cable warned consulate couldn't withstand 'coordinated attack'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Exclusive: Classified cable warned consulate couldn't withstand 'coordinated attack'
Oct 31st 2012, 22:50

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an "emergency meeting" less than a month before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, because Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi and the consulate could not defend against a "coordinated attack," according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.

Summarizing an Aug. 15 emergency meeting convened by the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Aug. 16 cable marked "SECRET" said that the State Department's senior security officer, also known as the RSO, did not believe the consulate could be protected.

"RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound," the cable said.

According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed "on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to 'Takfirist thugs.'" Each U.S. mission has a so-called Emergency Action Committee that is responsible for security measures and emergency planning.

The details in the cable seemed to foreshadow the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. compound, which was a coordinated, commando-style assault using direct and indirect fire. Al Qaeda in North Africa and Ansar al-Sharia, both mentioned in the cable, have since been implicated in the consulate attack.

In addition to describing the security situation in Benghazi as "trending negatively," the cable said explicitly that the mission would ask for more help. "In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover."

As for specific threats against the U.S., the cable warned the intelligence was not clear on the issue, cautioning that the militias in Benghazi were not concerned with any significant retaliation from the Libyan government, which had apparently lost control in Benghazi. A briefer explained that they "did not have information suggesting that these entities were targeting Americans but did caveat that (there was not) a complete picture of their intentions yet. RSO (Regional Security Officer) noted that the Benghazi militias have become more brazen in their actions and have little fear of reprisal from the (government of Libya.)"

While the administration's public statements have suggested that the attack came without warning, the Aug. 16 cable seems to undercut those claims. It was a direct warning to the State Department that the Benghazi consulate was vulnerable to attack, that it could not be defended and that the presence of anti-U.S. militias and Al Qaeda was well-known to the U.S. intelligence community.

In a three-page cable on Sept 11, the day Stevens and the three other Americans were killed, Stevens wrote about "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" with the security forces and Libyan police. The ambassador saw both as "too weak to keep the country secure."

Fox News asked the State Department to respond to a series of questions about the Aug. 16 cable, including who was specifically charged with reviewing it and whether action was taken by Washington or Tripoli. Fox News also asked, given the specific warnings and the detailed intelligence laid out in the cable, whether the State Department considered extra measures for the consulate in light of the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks – and if no action was taken, who made that call.

The State Department press office declined to answer specific questions, citing the classified nature of the cable.

"An independent board is conducting a thorough review of the assault on our post in Benghazi," Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner said in written statement. "Once we have the board's comprehensive account of what happened, findings and recommendations, we can fully address these matters."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Ind. Dem. Donnelly walks careful line on abortion

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ind. Dem. Donnelly walks careful line on abortion
Oct 31st 2012, 21:42

  INDIANAPOLIS –  Indiana Democratic Senate hopeful Joe Donnelly is being careful how he uses his Republican rival's remark about abortion after rape because of his own record sponsoring legislation on the issue.

His ads slam Republican rival Richard Mourdock for saying that pregnancies resulting from rape are something "God intended." But what they don't mention--and what Donnelly doesn't bring up on the campaign trail--is that the Democrat twice supported a bill that would have denied federal abortion funding even in cases of rape and incest.

In fact, Donnelly and Mourdock oppose abortion. Donnelly would support it in cases of rape, incest and when the life of the mother is endangered by the pregnancy, which conflicts with the bill he supported. Mourdock only supports an exception for life of the mother.

Donnelly explains that while he opposes abortion he didn't initially realize the bill would have gone that far, yet the issue has made it difficult for him to capitalize on Mourdock's comment, even as it reverberated in the national battle for control of the Senate. Republicans must gain four seats to win control if President Barack Obama is reelected; three if Republican Mitt Romney prevails. Indiana is one of a series of states in which the Senate race remains stubbornly tied.

From President Barack Obama to outside groups, Democrats have made much of Mourdock's rape comment. But inside Indiana, the similarities between the two candidates and an electorate with deeply rooted socially conservative beliefs have limited Donnelly's options on how to capitalize on it.

Immediately after the debate in which Mourdock made the comment, Donnelly joined a chorus of Democrats and even some Republicans in denouncing it. But Donnelly took few questions at a press conference he called the following day, and later turned over the sharp rhetoric to the state's former Democratic Party chairwoman.

Although many Democrats had hoped Mourdock's comment would be the October surprise needed to push Donnelly to victory, Donnelly instead has been forced to explain again and again why he supported a measure that would have created a separate class of "forcible rape." He says the language was an oversight in legislation that would have otherwise restated the "Hyde amendment" banning federal funding for abortion in certain cases.

"I said in February of 2011, `Look, I want to prevent federal funds from being used for abortion-related services, but unless this language is taken out, I cannot vote for it,"' Donnelly said Tuesday.

Just days before the election, Donnelly is leaving the sharpest words to his party and outside groups. But the bill he supported makes that awkward.

A new ad by a Democratic-aligned super PAC hits gubernatorial candidate Mike Pence to Mourdock on the basis of the congressman's support for the "forcible rape" legislation, but does't mention Donnelly. And a new Donnelly commercial hits Mourdock for his now-famous comments--without mentioning the legislation.

The Mourdock campaign has griped to reporters that Donnelly is getting a free pass on the issue, and Mourdock says it's Donnelly's choice if he wants to crack open the abortion issue on the campaign trail.

"The fact that he's going to politicize that issue, I think, is a decision he has to make," Mourdock said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Bachmann in tough re-election bid, as challenger attacks her political star

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Bachmann in tough re-election bid, as challenger attacks her political star
Oct 31st 2012, 19:53

Rep. Michele Bachmann's ascent from Minnesota state senator to U.S. congresswoman and Tea Party star to Republican presidential candidate is being turned against her as she battles in an unexpectedly tight reelection race.

Democratic challenger and political newcomer Jim Graves has tried to portray Bachmann as somebody whose ambition has resulted in her losing touch with Minnesota residents.

Voters "need somebody that can create jobs, not headlines," Graves said Tuesday night in the candidates' first debate.

Two of Washington's top election handicappers – The Cook Political Report and The Rothenberg Political Report -- still think Bachmann will win a fourth term and have put the race in the "lean Republican" column.

But Graves, an entrepreneur and businessman, appears formidable, with the Cook report calling him "the strongest opponent (Bachmann) has ever faced."

This week could be the determining factor, with one debate down and two more left to go.

And Bachmann is making an overt effort to rebut Graves' claims, noting she has been living in, and later representing, Minnesota for practically her entire life.

Bachmann on Tuesday night responded to Grave's absentee attack by saying she visits the district almost every weekend.

"I am here," she added. "I am one of you. I've been in this district since I was in elementary school."

To be sure, Bachmann is a prolific fundraiser, making the House race one of the most expensive this election cycle, despite national parties and outside groups having spent little.

Bachmann raised about $13 million through mid-October, while Graves collected almost $2 million, including $520,000 from his own pocket.

Their campaign is playing out across the state's conservative 6 congressional district, which stretches from the St. Cloud area to northern and western Twin Cities suburbs. The district grew more conservative when political boundaries were redrawn this year

Bachmann also continued with her attack on Graves as a big spender who would drive the country further into debt – a Bachmann TV ad calls him "Big Spending Jim."

The race is a far cry from the Republican presidential primary campaign Bachmann waged, in which she focused on national and international issues like Iran, the health care overhaul and immigration policy.

Much of the District 6 debate – and the overall race – has focused on a bridge between Minnesota and Wisconsin near Stillwater, Minn., which now lies outside the district's new boundaries.

During the debate, Bachmann name-dropped Democrats including Gov. Mark Dayton, Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi as she said she exercised bipartisan muscle to pass the bill that helped build the bridge.

"A miracle happened and we finally got it done," she said.

Graves said he wouldn't have voted for the bridge design that passed, calling it a Rolls Royce when a less expensive Chevy would have done.

The entire project is estimated to cost $580 million to $676 million.

The feisty debate crowd of several hundred appeared to have more Graves supporters, with some jeering Bachmann several times, including once when she claimed that taxes would go up if Graves were elected.

The candidates are slated to debate again on public radio, then local television.

Graves' campaign manager Adam Graves suggested the campaign wasn't banking on a game-changer for them at the remaining debates – but wasn't ruling it out either.

"We're not expecting a surprise, but we wouldn't be surprised," campaign manager Adam Graves said Wednesday. "She's a provocative individual, which is great for fundraising but that has not produced one net job in this district over the past six years."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Fox News poll: Voters disapprove of Obama on economy, Libya

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Fox News poll: Voters disapprove of Obama on economy, Libya
Oct 31st 2012, 20:30

As President Barack Obama makes his closing arguments before the election, less than half of likely voters approve of the job he's doing on the top issues facing the country.  In addition, more voters than not think the administration's policies toward Egypt and Libya have failed.

Forty-five percent of voters say the Obama administration's policies toward Egypt and Libya have "mostly failed," while 39 percent say they have "mostly succeeded."  

Likewise, 39 percent approve of the job Obama is doing on Libya.  Forty-seven percent of voters disapprove.

That's according to a Fox News poll of likely voters released Wednesday.

Voters are divided over how the Obama administration handled the September 11, 2012 attack on diplomatic facilities in Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans: 44 percent of voters think the administration tried to mislead Americans about what happened there, while 47 percent disagree.  

Eight in 10 Republicans think the White House tried to mislead the public.  That's more than seven times as many as the 11 percent of Democrats who feel that way.  

By a 49-42 percent margin independents say the administration tried to mislead Americans.

A 55-percent majority of voters thinks the Obama administration has been "too soft" on radical Muslim terrorists.  That's more than twice as many as say "about right" (26 percent).  Few -- 4 percent -- say the administration has been "too tough."  

The president receives his best (and only positive) rating for his handling of foreign policy:  49 percent of voters approve and 44 percent disapprove.

By a 52-45 percent margin, voters disapprove of how the president's dealing with the economy.  That's Obama's highest disapproval rating for any issue in the poll.  Even so, that's an improvement from a high of 61 percent disapproval among likely voters before the 2010 midterm election (October 2010).

On health care, 47 percent of voters approve and 50 percent disapprove.  For immigration, it's 44 percent approve and 46 percent disapprove.

Overall, Obama continues to receive mixed reviews for his job performance:  50 percent of likely voters approve and 47 percent disapprove.  He's received 49 to 50 percent approval among likely voters since early September.

Approval of Obama among Democrats (91 percent) is matched by disapproval among Republicans (92 percent).  Among independents, 42 percent approve and 53 percent disapprove.

The Fox News poll is based on live telephone interviews on landlines and cell phones from October 28 to October 30 among 1,128 randomly-chosen likely voters nationwide.  Likely voters are registered voters who are considered most likely to vote in the November presidential election.  Interviews in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy were completed before Monday evening, when the hurricane made landfall.  The poll is conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R).  For the total sample, it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.  

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Fox News poll: Race for the White House a dead heat

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Fox News poll: Race for the White House a dead heat
Oct 31st 2012, 20:40

With less than a week before the election, the race for the White House is dead even: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney receive 46 percent each, according to a Fox News poll of likely voters.

Romney had a razor-thin 46-45 percent edge earlier this month, after the first presidential debate (October 7-9).  

Interviews in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy were completed before Monday evening, when the hurricane made landfall.

Independents give the edge to Romney by seven percentage points (46-39 percent).  That's down from a 12-point advantage in early October.  

There's a gender gap in vote preference, as men back Romney by 51-42 percent, while women side with Obama by 50-42 percent.  

The new Fox poll finds Obama under-performing compared to his 2008 exit poll numbers by 13 percentage points among independents, 9 points among white men, 6 points among women and 4 points among voters under age 30.  

Among the subgroup of most interested voters, those who are "extremely" interested in the election, Romney leads Obama by 53-42 percent.

The poll, released Wednesday, shows almost all Obama (92 percent) and Romney (91 percent) supporters say they will "definitely" vote for their candidate.  Seven percent of Obama voters and eight percent of Romney voters say they will "probably" support or "lean" toward supporting their candidate.  

Still, Romney's supporters continue to be more enthusiastic: 69 percent say it's extremely important he win, while 59 percent of those backing Obama feel that way.  

And consider this: Fully 82 percent of Romney supporters say this year's election is more important than the 2008 election.  That's 16 points higher than the 66 percent of Obama supporters who say the same.  

Overall, 73 percent of voters feel this year's election is more important than 2008.  

Some good news in the poll for Obama is that nearly half of voters -- 46 percent -- are satisfied with the way things are going in the country today.  That's up from 31 percent two years ago, right before Republicans swept the midterm elections (October 2010).

In addition, by a slim two percentage-point margin, more voters think the economy is getting better than getting worse (45-43 percent).  

The Romney campaign is focused on the 53 percent of voters who are unhappy with the way things are going in the country today, and the 50 percent who agree with him that government is too big.

Meanwhile, over half of voters -- 55 percent -- would like to see all or part of Obama's health care law repealed -- something Romney's said he would do on "Day 1."

Nearly equal numbers of voters would be comfortable with each of the candidates as president:  44 percent would be comfortable with Obama for another four years, and 40 percent would be comfortable with Romney as president.  Majorities would be uncomfortable with each (55 percent Obama, 58 percent Romney).

Forty-four percent of voters say economic issues such as jobs and growth will be most important in deciding their vote for president.  That's more than twice as many as any other issues.  Sixteen percent say fiscal issues such as taxes, the deficit and government spending, 13 percent say social issues and seven percent national security issues.

Voters who say the economy will be most important in their decision back Romney by 50-43 percent, and fiscal-issue voters back him by a similar 50-41 percent.

In addition, more voters trust Romney on the top issues.  More trust him to improve the economy (+9 points), reduce the deficit (+5 points) and manage their taxes (+5 points).  By 54-41 percent, voters also think Romney has the right experience to create more jobs.

Obama comes out on top on handling foreign policy (+8 points), helping people achieve the American dream (+8 points), handling education (+7 points) and terrorism (+6 points).

The candidates are tied on taking the country in the right direction, encouraging the right values, handling health care and national security.  

In addition, the two are about equally liked by voters.  Fifty-two percent have a favorable opinion of Obama, while 51 percent have a positive view of Romney.

When voters are given more options to describe their views, the poll shows most like Obama as a person (69 percent).  On his policies, some 48 percent like them, while 51 dislike them.

A 56-percent majority of voters likes Romney as a person.  On his policies, voters divide almost evenly:  48 percent like his policies and 49 percent dislike them.

Forty-seven percent of voters like both Obama and his policies, while 42 percent like both Romney and his policies.  

Some 29 percent dislike both Obama and his policies.  For Romney, that's 35 percent.

The Fox News poll is based on live telephone interviews on landlines and cell phones from October 28 to October 30 among 1,128 randomly-chosen likely voters nationwide.  Likely voters are registered voters who are considered most likely to vote in the November presidential election.  The poll is conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R).  For the total sample, it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.  

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: In Mass., Brown, Warren wind up for final pitches

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
In Mass., Brown, Warren wind up for final pitches
Oct 31st 2012, 21:48

BOSTON –  Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown is casting himself as an independent Republican voice and Democratic rival Elizabeth Warren says she'll guarantee women equal pay as the nation's costliest Senate contest races toward an Election Day finale. But for all of the cash and careful messaging, the result could hinge on which campaign is better organized to turn out voters.

"I've kept my promise to be an independent voice. I put people ahead of politics and now I need your help to keep that independent tradition alive in Massachusetts," Brown says in his final ad, which features him embracing voters and driving his pickup truck. But it avoids any mention of Brown's party affiliation. While Massachusetts is home to fellow Republican Mitt Romney--whose campaign Brown has endorsed--the only image of a presidential candidate in the 60-second ad is Democrat Barack Obama. The president holds a commanding lead over Romney in the state.

The ad closes: "Vote the person, not the party."

Warren's final pitch, meanwhile, casts her as a fighter for the middle class and portrays Brown as beholden to millionaires, billionaires and "big oil."

"For all the families still struggling, all the people who deserve a decent job, and the women who deserve equal pay. For our kids, crushed by student debt, and our parents, worried about Medicare. Know this: My fight is for you," Warren says in the ad unveiled Wednesday.

They were the closing arguments of a $66 million Senate race, the nation's most expensive in a year of close contests that have left control of the chamber in question. Republicans must gain four seats to win the majority of Obama wins reelection, three if Romney prevails.

With polls showing a tight contest, the result could depend on which candidate has the better-organized turnout operation.

Brown could face stiff headwinds in a state where Republicans hold a small fraction of elected seats, but the state party is mounting what it says is the largest volunteer field operation in its history.

"It is more elaborate, organized and productive than when Scott won the 2010 election because we have had the time to build a robust infrastructure," said party spokesman Tim Buckley.

Warren campaign officials say they're hoping to knock on a million doors and make 2 million phone calls in the final four days before the Nov. 6 election. The Massachusetts Democratic Party and the state's labor unions are also vowing to turn out supporters to help reclaim the seat -- held for nearly half a century by Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy until his 2009 death.

In person and on the air, the candidates are making their closing arguments in a campaign that has put the spotlight on social issues.

Brown and Warren both describe themselves as "pro-choice," but Warren has repeatedly pointed to Brown's support for an amendment that would have let employers and insurers refuse health coverage for services they say violate their moral convictions, including contraception.

Brown said he was defending the religious rights of Catholics, but Warren warned a vote for Brown could help put a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, endangering abortion rights.

Brown has countered by arguing Warren supports higher taxes, including those in the 2010 Affordable Care Act signed by Obama. Brown supports repealing what he calls "Obamacare" and has taken a no new taxes pledge.

There will be no fourth and final debate, a casualty of superstorm Sandy. Warren agreed to a rescheduled debate on Thursday, but Brown declined.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Superstorm Sandy could still bring chaos to election day

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Superstorm Sandy could still bring chaos to election day
Oct 31st 2012, 18:19

Widespread power outages along the East Coast had officials in at least four states scrambling Wednesday to devise contingency plans for Election Day voting.

In New York, where at least 26 people statewide died and nearly 2 million remain without power as of Wednesday, Board of Elections officials continue to work with county authorities and Gov. Andrew Cuomo regarding contingency plans. No additional information was available, a spokeswoman told FoxNews.com.

"Due to hurricane Sandy, poll site information for the November 6, 2012 election may change," a state Board of Elections website reads.

Federal law sets the election for the day after the first Monday in November, under authority granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can change Election Day, according to an 1845 law. Although it has never happened, some experts said every state would have to be included if the calendar were changed.

More likely is the prospect that hard-hit states will manage with a hodge-podge of contingencies. Some states, including Connecticut and Massachusetts, use paper ballots that are then counted by electronic scanning equipment, so counting the ballots could be done where the power is on. Experts also said voting equipment could be operate on battery power or, under the worst case scenario, all voting could be done on paper ballots which could then be counted by hand.

Roughly 100 of Connecticut's 770 voting locations are without power, according to Secretary of State Denise Merrill, but she said Tuesday's election would go on as planned.

"It will go forward no matter what," Merrill said by phone. "I think we're in pretty good shape."

"It will go forward no matter what."

- Denise Merrill, Connecticut secretary of state

As a result of Sandy's destruction, voting registration has been extended to 8 p.m. Thursday, she said.

Restoring power to affected polling sites in the states is a top priority, added Merrill's spokesman Av Harris.

"We should be reluctant to move polling places because those are usually neighborhood fixtures. You don't want to confuse voters. It's sort of a last resort," Harris told FoxNews.com.

In New Jersey, which suffered some of the worst storm devastation, officials were still working out an alternative plan as of Wednesday afternoon.

"It's too early for me to say anything," a representative from the state board of elections told FoxNews.com, adding that a plan should be in place by Thursday morning.

The plan could include the use of paper ballots instead of electronic voting machines and a change in polling sites for communities that typically rely on area schools. A postponement appears highly unlikely, though voting hours could be extended at various polling locations.

Federal Emergency Management Agency's administrator, Craig Fugate, told the Associated Press on Monday he anticipated the storm's impact could linger into next week and affect the election.  FEMA would look at what assistance it could provide to states prior to next Tuesday, he said.

"This will be led by the states," Fugate said.

Hours after the powerful storm pummeled New Jersey's shore towns — causing billions in damage — Gov. Chris Christie told reporters Tuesday that Election Day logistics were not among his concerns.

"I don't give a damn about Election Day," he said. "It doesn't matter a lick to me. I've got much bigger fish to fry."

"Right now I'm much more concerned about preventing any other loss of life, getting people to safe places," Christie said.

President Obama earlier this week scrapped two days of campaigning and hunkered down at the White House to oversee the government's response to a storm that has affected voters in at least 13 states.

"The election will take care of itself next week," Obama told reporters on Monday.

FoxNews.com's Cristina Corbin and Joshua Rhett Miller contributed to this report. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Chicago-area official drops bullet tax proposal

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Chicago-area official drops bullet tax proposal
Oct 31st 2012, 19:24

CHICAGO –  The top official in the county that encompasses Chicago said Wednesday that she will drops plans for a controversial nickel-per-bullet tax but will continue support for a $25 tax on firearms.

Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle had said the ordinance was more about addressing gun violence than raising money for the nation's second-largest county, which faces a budget shortfall of more than $260 million.

But there were questions about whether Preckwinkle had enough support for the tax from members of the board, who will vote on a proposed budget Friday.

 Cook County Commissioner Edwin Reyes told the Chicago Sun-Times that Preckwinkle's office is, "trying to figure out what to do. They don't have the support for it."

In addition to pulling the bullet tax, Preckwinkle said she would create a $2 million anti-gun violence fund that will be overseen by an advisory committee.

The proposed tax angered gun-rights advocates, who predicted it would drive business from Cook County and to neighboring Indiana and Wisconsin.

The Chicago Tribune reports the bullet tax was expected to raise $400,000 and the firearm tax $600,000.

Preckwinkle proposed using proceeds from the tax for various county services including medical care for gunshot victims. Law enforcement officials would not have to pay the tax, but Preckwinkle's office had said it would apply to 40 federally licensed gun dealers in the county.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama administration denounces Bahrain ban on public demonstrations

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama administration denounces Bahrain ban on public demonstrations
Oct 31st 2012, 19:44

Published October 31, 2012

Associated Press

WASHINGTON –  The Obama administration is denouncing in unusually harsh terms a ban on public demonstrations imposed by Bahrain, a key American ally in the Gulf that is home to the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet.

The State Department said Wednesday that Washington was "deeply concerned" by the ban, which it said violates freedom of assembly, association and expression. Spokesman Mark Toner said the move runs "contrary" to Bahrain's promises to reform and urged authorities to respect commitments to uphold fundamental human rights.

He said the government should work with the opposition to address complaints that have sparked months of unrest. He also called on the opposition to renounce violence and for both sides to restore confidence and stability.

Bahrain's interior minister stressed Wednesday that the ban is only temporary.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Minnesota candidate guilty of marijuana sales still in race

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Minnesota candidate guilty of marijuana sales still in race
Oct 31st 2012, 16:28

Published October 31, 2012

Associated Press

ST. CHARLES, Minn. –  A mayoral candidate in Winona County admits his conviction for selling marijuana could "throw a few complications" into his campaign.

Stephen Conlin says he's committed to his campaign for mayor of St. Charles. Conlin will be eligible to vote for himself on Tuesday because he hasn't been sentenced. But, should he defeat incumbent Bill Spitzer, he would not be able to hold office because of his felony conviction. He's scheduled for sentencing in December.

Minnesota Secretary of State spokesman Pat Turgeon tells the Winona Daily News that if Conlin is elected, it would be up to the city to decide how to fill the vacancy.

Conlin was convicted last week of selling and possessing marijuana. The charges are the result of a 2010 raid on his home and downtown barbershop.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Republicans senators press Obama admin. again for answers on Benghazi

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Republicans senators press Obama admin. again for answers on Benghazi
Oct 31st 2012, 16:24

Four Republican senators accused President Obama on Wednesday of ignoring their repeated requests for information about the Libya terror attack, raising the question of whether the administration is "deliberately stonewalling" Congress.

The senators, who have blasted out a series of inquiries to various agencies since the deadly Sept. 11 strike, said Wednesday that "we have failed to receive a single letter in response."

"The American people and their representatives in Congress need to understand what you knew about the Benghazi terrorist attack and when you knew it," wrote Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H.; and Ron Johnson, R-Wis. "We also have a right to know what steps you and your administration took — or failed to take — before, during and after the terrorist attack to protect American lives."

The senators, in their lengthy letter, recapped all their concerns and questions – ranging from when officials first determined the attack was terrorism to whether Obama knew about two prior attacks this year on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi to why requests for earlier security were denied.

"Your failure to answer these important questions will only add to the growing perception among many of our constituents that your administration has undertaken a concerted effort to misrepresent the facts and stonewall Congress and the American people," the senators wrote.

Scrutiny of the administration's response to and handling of the Libya attack had been mounting in recent days, before superstorm Sandy practically suspended the presidential campaign for two days and drew Obama back to the White House. Lawmakers, though, are keeping up the pressure on the administration – as the father of Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL killed in the attack, starts to speak out about his frustration with the administration's handling of the entire tragedy.

The questions at this point have spread far beyond concerns about why officials initially described the strike as a "spontaneous" act in response to demonstrations over an anti-Islam film.

The latest letter renews the senators' call to declassify surveillance footage in and around the consulate on Sept. 11 and Sept. 12.

The renewed request came after senior intelligence officials told Fox News that a Tunisian man arrested in connection with the attack was identified by the internal surveillance video.

The senators also reiterated questions about what military forces were available to help during the attack, and what forces were requested.

Fox News reported last week that sources claim officers at the nearby CIA annex in Benghazi were twice told to stand down when they requested to help those at the consulate. They later ignored those orders.

Fox News was also told that a subsequent request for back-up when the annex came under attack was denied as well.

The CIA and Defense Department have denied claims about requests for support being rejected.

"The agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi," said CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood last week. "Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need. Claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."  

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help. 

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," he said Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on." 

Obama, meanwhile, declined to answer directly during a TV interview last week on whether a request for military assistance was denied.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.