Sunday, September 30, 2012

FOXNews.com: Some illegal immigrants may get drivers licenses under new California law

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Some illegal immigrants may get drivers licenses under new California law
Oct 1st 2012, 05:51

Some illegal immigrants could get California drivers licenses under a bill that Gov. Jerry Brown announced he signed into law late Sunday.

AB2189 by Assemblyman Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, will let the Department of Motor Vehicles issue licenses to illegal immigrants eligible for work permits under a new Obama administration policy. The bill requires the department to accept as proof of legal residence whatever document the federal government provides to participants in its deferred action program.

Cedillo said his bill will make roads safer while letting young immigrants drive to school and to work. His reasoning drew support from several Republican lawmakers, while other Republicans argued the state should leave immigration issues to the federal government.

"It is a victory for those who were brought here through no choice of their own, played by the rules, and are only asking to be included in and contribute to American society," Cedillo said in a statement.

He said California is the first state to grant drivers' licenses to the group singled out under the Obama administration's policy. Cedillo praised Brown for choosing "public safety over politics" by signing the bill.

"President Obama has recognized the unique status of these students, and making them eligible to apply for driver's licenses is an obvious next step," Brown spokesman Gil Duran said.

Meanwhile, Brown vetoed AB1081, which could have protected illegal immigrants from deportation if they committed minor infractions. The bill has been dubbed "anti-Arizona" legislation, a reference to that state's immigrant identification law.

The so-called Trust Act would have let California opt out of some parts of a federal program that requires local law enforcement officers to check the fingerprints of people they arrest against a federal immigration database and hold those who are in the country illegally.

It would have barred local law enforcement officers from detaining suspects for possible deportation unless they are charged with serious or violent felonies.

Brown backed comprehensive federal immigration reform, and said in a veto message that federal agents "shouldn't try to coerce local law enforcement officials into detaining people who've been picked up for minor offenses and pose no reasonable threat to their community."

However, he said the list of serious or violent felonies in the bill is "fatally flawed because it omits many serious crimes." He said those include child abuse, drug trafficking, and weapons violations, among others. He promised to work with lawmakers to fix the bill's wording.

California law enforcement officials have turned over about 80,000 illegal immigrants for deportation since 2009, though fewer than half had committed a serious or violent felony. The majority of those deported by the federal government under the Secure Communities program have come from California.

Supporters say the program targets otherwise law-abiding immigrants who commit minor traffic infractions, sell food without a permit or are arrested on misdemeanors charges but never convicted. Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, said the program wastes local resources and causes mistrust between immigrants and law enforcement agencies.

Several Republican legislators objected that Ammiano's bill would have removed a valuable tool for ridding California of lawbreakers.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: California to become first state to ban gay teen 'conversion' therapy

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
California to become first state to ban gay teen 'conversion' therapy
Oct 1st 2012, 03:06

Published September 30, 2012

Associated Press

  • Brown_pension.jpg

    FILE: Sept.12, 2012 : California Gov, Jerry Brown at a news conference in Los Angeles where he signed into law sweeping pension changes.AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. –  California will become the first state to ban a controversial form of psychotherapy aimed at making gay teenagers straight.

Gov. Jerry Brown announced Sunday that he had signed SB1172 by Democratic Senator Ted Lieu of Torrance. Lieu says the law will prevent children from being psychologically abused.

Effective Jan. 1, the state will prohibit what is known as reparative or conversion therapy for minors.

Brown says the therapies "have no basis in science or medicine and they will now be relegated to the dustbin of quackery."

Gay rights groups say the practice is dangerous because it can put youth at higher risk of depression and suicide.

Conservative religious groups and some Republicans argue that banning conversion therapy would hinder parents' right to provide psychological care for children experiencing gender confusion.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Republicans launch new ads focusing on economy for 13 House races

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Republicans launch new ads focusing on economy for 13 House races
Oct 1st 2012, 04:00

Republicans are releasing new TV ads for 13 House races across the country Monday that focus on jobs and the economy, as part of their effort to keep control of the chamber in November.

The ads cost roughly $3 million and were paid for by the National Republican Congressional Committee. They focus on four races – one each in Illinois, Ohio, Nevada and New York.  

The races in New York's 21st and Ohio's 16th congressional districts are considered tossups with about five weeks remaining before Election Day. And the race for Illinois' 10th district seat -- held by Republican incumbent Rep. Bob Dold -- is leaning Democrat, according to the non-partisan Rothenberg Political Report.

"Democrats helped create the Obama economy that has left 23 million Americans struggling for work," NRCC communications director Paul Lindsay told FoxNews.com. "These ads will help make sure they're held accountable for it in November."

In the New York race, Republicans are trying to knock off incumbent Bill Owens, elected to Congress in a 2009 special election that made him the first Democrat to hold that seat since the mid-1800s.

"As the leaves change with the seasons, Congressman Bill Owens changes with the political winds," say the narrator in the 30-second spot

The ad accuses Owens of supporting a federal stimulus plan that gave Wall Street executives "obscene" bonuses but now claiming to care more about the main streets of upstate New York.

Republicans took control of the House following the 2010 election. They now have a 242-193 majority and are expected to keep control of the chamber in November, with Democrats likely to gain no more than 10 seats, according to the Rothenberg report.

In Ohio's redrawn 16th congressional district, freshman Republican Rep. Jim Renacci is running against Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton in a too-close-to call race already getting outside money from super PACs on both sides.

The other races are California's 24th and 52nd congressional districts, Georgia's 12th, Iowa's 4th, Illinois' 12th, Minnesota's 8th, North Carolina's 7th, New York's 1st and Wisconsin's 7th.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Ryan says Obama's foreign policy 'unraveling,' Romney's will be about US 'strength'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ryan says Obama's foreign policy 'unraveling,' Romney's will be about US 'strength'
Sep 30th 2012, 20:41

Republican vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan on Sunday criticized President Obama's response to the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya, saying it is just part of a larger "unraveling" of his foreign policy.

"Their response was slow. It was confused, it was inconsistent," Ryan said on "Fox News Sunday." "It's part of a bigger picture of the fact that the Obama foreign policy is unraveling literally before our eyes on our TV screens."

Ryan made his remarks just days before Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is expected to give a major foreign policy speech.

"What Mitt Romney's going to do is lay out a very different vision for foreign policy -- one that is a policy of American strength versus what I would articulate or claim the president's policy is one of weakness," Ryan said.

The Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. The White House initially said the attack was a "spontaneous" response to a anti-Islamic video trailer but has since acknowledged it was a planned terror attack.

The Wisconsin congressman on Sunday also called the recent violence in the Middle East "the ugly fruits of the Obama foreign policy," arguing that 20,000 people have been killed, Iran is closer to a nuclear weapon and Russia is "thwarting us at every stage."

Ryan called Iran "the biggest threat we have today" and said the big issue is Obama's credibility.

"The Ayatollahs in Iran, they have to make a decision to stop pursuing a nuclear weapon and pursue a peaceful resolution," he said. "I would argue that they're not doing that because the president doesn't have credibility."

Ryan also said he and Romney have repeatedly said the U.S. has to stop Iran's nuclear weapons capability and that a Romney-Ryan administration would not put "daylight between our allies, especially Israel."

He also said the president has "moved his rhetoric a bit to look more like ours, and that's good, but the problem is it's built upon a mountain of non-credible actions."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: DeMint joins national effort to keep feds from bailing out state pension systems

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
DeMint joins national effort to keep feds from bailing out state pension systems
Sep 30th 2012, 18:27

Illinois Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn is getting hit with a nationwide backlash over his suggestion that the federal government bailout the state employees' pension program.

Critics have of the past several days pounced on the suggestion, made last year when Quinn, in announcing the state's fiscal 2012, said part of Illinois' long-term effort to reduce the estimate $167 billion in under-funded liabilities would be to seek "a federal guarantee of the debt."

Among those leading the charge is Republican Sen. Jim DeMint. The South Carolina senator has joined the Illinois Policy Institute's national "No Pension Bailout" campaign -- an effort to stop Congress from attempting to rescue failing state and municipal pension plans.

"Our greatest concern is states will assume they can run their pension systems into bankruptcy and then turn to the federal government for bailout," DeMint said Thursday.

He also suggested the problem is the result of state legislators trying for decades to win over voters through pension promises based "on account methods that would put any business in jail."

The conservative policy group estimates the total amount of under-funded pension liabilities in states is at least $2.5 trillion, with Illinois leading the nation.

The basic plan floated by Quinn would be for the federal government to rescue the pension program through buying the state's bonds, which critics say are too financially risky to attract investors.  

Quinn said after announcing the budget that seeking the federal guarantee was only a precaution, then later called the related wording a "drafting error," according the non-partisan Citizens Against Government Waste, which nevertheless gave the governor its September 2012 "Porker of the Month" award.

The governor's office could not be reached for comment this weekend.

The Wall Street Journal's editorial writers recently said: "Sooner or later, we knew it would come down to this since the Democrats who are running Illinois into the ground can't bring themselves to oppose union demands."

In addition, an editorial Tuesday in the Chicago Tribune argued that saving Illinois will "start a stampede of demands for equal treatment from other financially troubled states" with public pension debts ranging from $1 trillion to $25 trillion.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: California governor signs bill giving juvenile prisoners a second chance

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
California governor signs bill giving juvenile prisoners a second chance
Sep 30th 2012, 20:34

SACRAMENTO, Calif. –  Gov. Jerry Brown on Sunday announced signing a bill that could one day bring the release of some criminals who were sentenced as juveniles to life in prison.

There are 309 inmates serving life-without-parole sentences in California for murders committed when they were younger than 18.

Brown signed SB9, by Democratic Sen. Leland Yee of San Francisco. It would let the inmates ask judges to reconsider their sentences after they serve at least 15 years in prison.

Judges could then reduce the no-parole sentence to 25 years-to-life if the inmate shows remorse and is taking steps toward rehabilitation.

Yee said his bill recognizes that young people's brains and impulse control grow as they age. His bill was opposed by the state's major law enforcement and victims' organizations.

"I am proud that today California said we believe all kids, even those we had given up on in the past, are deserving of a second chance," Yee said in a statement.

California is one of 39 states that allow judges to sentence minors to die in prison. More than 2,570 people convicted as juveniles are serving life sentences without the possibility of parole in the U.S., according to the Youth Justice Coalition, an Inglewood-based group concerned with the treatment of juvenile offenders.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles as unconstitutional "cruel and unusual" punishment. But the ruling didn't affect California's law because it already gives judges the discretion to impose a sentence of 25 years-to-life.

Opponents say the bill is unfair to victims' families. Allowing the possibility of parole would force the survivors to relive their experience as they fight against parole.

"Before, we had life without possibility of parole -- without," said Maggie Elvey of Sacramento, who helped organize opposition to the bill. "It's so sad that they're taking the justice away."

She said survivors like herself were told that their loved one's murderers would never be released from prison.

"It's not fair to go retroactive back to all those killers," she said.

Yee struggled for a year to get the bill through the Legislature over opposition from organizations representing police chiefs, sheriffs, prosecutors, victims and many rank-and-file law enforcement officers. He had support from some individual law enforcement officials, notably San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon, Police Chief Greg Suhr and interim Sheriff Vicki Hennessy.

It was his third attempt in five years. He succeeded in getting it through the Legislature this year, with no Republican votes, only after amending the bill to exclude young offenders who tortured their victims or killed a law enforcement officer or firefighter.

The exemptions are not enough to satisfy survivors such as Elvey.

"Victims hate that, when they say that one person's loved one is more important than another," Elvey said.

Her husband, Ross, was murdered by two teens during the robbery of his gun shop in Vista, Calif.

"They held Ross down on the floor and just kept beating and beating him," she said.

He was in a coma for 41 days before he died on June 7, 1993.

"They're all violent, brutal murders," she said. "That's why they got this sentence."

The bill had the support of numerous mental health and medical associations, along with defense attorneys and church groups. Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union also back the legislation.

The groups note that some offenders were sentenced to life without parole as accomplices to murder, despite not being the actual killer.

One of them is Christian Bracamontes, who was 16 in 1998 when he and another youth tried to rob another teenager of his marijuana. Bracamontes' friend fatally shot 15-year-old Thomas Williams in Fontana.

Bracamontes turned down a plea deal and was convicted of murder during a robbery with the special circumstance of knowing that a gun would be used. Bracamontes consistently claimed he never expected his friend to fire the weapon or kill Williams.

"A lot of kids don't understand aiding-and-abetting," prosecutor John Davis told The Press-Enterprise newspaper of Riverside when Bracamontes was sentenced in 2000.

Bracamontes is now 31 and serving his life term in California State Prison, Los Angeles County in Lancaster. The shooter, Jose Morales, who was two years older, negotiated a plea deal that eventually could result in his release.

The district attorneys' association notes that virtually all the inmates sentenced to life in prison as juveniles in California were 16 or 17 at the time of the offense and were convicted of first-degree murder with one or more special circumstances. That could have brought them the death penalty had they been older.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Supreme Court begins new term Monday with voting rights a top issue

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Supreme Court begins new term Monday with voting rights a top issue
Sep 30th 2012, 14:46

The Supreme Court begins a new term beginning Monday with the prospect for major rulings about affirmative action, gay marriage and voting rights.

People on the left and right expect Justice John Roberts to side with the other conservative justices in the new term's big cases, after siding with conservative justices this summer in upholding most of President Obama's health care law. If they're right, the spotlight will be back on Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote typically is decisive in cases that otherwise split the court's liberals and conservatives.

But Roberts will be watched closely, following his health care vote, for fresh signs that he's becoming less ideologically predictable.

It may be that the dramatic health care decision presages "some shift in his tenure as chief justice," said Steve Shapiro, the American Civil Liberties Union's national legal director. "Or does it give him cover to continue to pursue a conservative agenda?"

The first piece of evidence could be in the court's consideration of the University of Texas' already limited use of race to help fill its incoming freshman classes, which comes before the court Oct. 10. The outcome could further limit or even end the use of racial preferences in college admissions.

Roberts has expressed contempt for the use of race in drawing legislative districts, calling it "a sordid business, this divvying us up by race," and in assigning students to public schools, saying that "the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

The written arguments submitted by both sides in the Texas case leave little doubt that Kennedy, not Roberts, holds the prized vote. The challengers of the Texas program and the university itself cite Kennedy's prior writings on affirmative action a combined 50 times.

The court also is expected to confront gay marriage in some form. Several cases seek to guarantee federal benefits for legally married same-sex couples. A provision of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act deprives same-sex couples of a range of federal benefits available to heterosexual couples.

Several federal courts have agreed that the provision of the law is unconstitutional, a situation that practically ensures that the high court will step in.

A separate appeal asks the justices to sustain California's Proposition 8, the amendment to the state constitution that outlawed gay marriage in the nation's largest state. Federal courts in California have struck down the amendment.

Once again, many legal analysts expect Roberts essentially to be against gay marriage. "The outcome clearly turns on how Anthony Kennedy votes," said Georgetown University law professor Michael Seidman.

The justices may not even consider whether to hear the gay marriage issue until November.

Another hot topic with appeals pending before the high court, and more soon to follow, is the future of a cornerstone law of the civil rights movement.

In 2006, Congress overwhelmingly approved, and President George W. Bush signed, legislation extending for 25 more years a critical piece of the Voting Rights Act. It requires states and local governments with a history of racial and ethnic discrimination, mainly in the South, to get advance approval either from the Justice Department or the federal court in Washington before making any changes that affect elections.

The requirement currently applies to the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. It also covers certain counties in California, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota, and some local jurisdictions in Michigan and New Hampshire. Coverage has been triggered by past discrimination not only against blacks, but also against American Indians, Asian-Americans, Alaskan Natives and Hispanics.

The court spoke skeptically about the provision in a 2009 decision, but left it mostly unchanged. Now, however, cases from Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas could prompt the court to deal head on with the issue of advance approval. The South Carolina and Texas cases involve voter identification laws; a similar Indiana law was previously upheld by the court.

It is unclear when the justices will decide whether to hear arguments in those cases. Arguments themselves would not take place until next year.

Yet there still is a chance that the court could become enmeshed in election disputes, even before the ballots are counted. Suits in Ohio over early voting and provisional ballots appear the most likely to find their way to the justices before the Nov. 6 election, said Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Irvine law school.

Among other important cases already on the court's docket:

— A high-stakes dispute, to be argued first thing Monday, between the business community and human rights advocates over the reach of a 1789 law. The issue is whether businesses can be sued in U.S. courts for human rights violations that take place on foreign soil and have foreign victims.

— A challenge to the use of drug-sniffing dogs in two situations. Florida police used a marijuana-sniffing dog's alert at the door of a private home to obtain a search warrant to look inside the house. The question is whether the dog's sniff itself was a search. A separate case looks at the reliability of animals trained to pick up the scent of illegal drugs.

— A challenge to the detention of a man who police picked up a mile away from an apartment they had a warrant to search. Occupants of a home may be detained during the search for the safety of officers, but this case tests how far that authority extends away from the place to be searched.

— Environmental disputes involving runoff from logging roads in Oregon and water pollution in Los Angeles.

Paul Clement, the Republican lawyer who lost the health care case and could be before the justices on gay marriage and voting rights, said last term punctured the notion that in close cases, the court goes where Kennedy wants.

"We've all been reminded that's not always the case," he said.

The idea that could be tested this term is whether Roberts' concern for the court as an institution that is apart from politics will influence his votes, or at least his reasoning, in the year's biggest cases.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Corker calls Obama administration's Libya response 'bizarre,' joins fellow Republicans in wanting answers

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Corker calls Obama administration's Libya response 'bizarre,' joins fellow Republicans in wanting answers
Sep 30th 2012, 14:25

Sen. Bob Corker has joined fellow congressional Republicans in calling for more and complete answers about the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya -- where four Americans were killed – calling the administration's response so far "bizarre."

Corker, R-Tenn., sent a letter this weekend to National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper Jr., who last week took responsibility for the administration originally calling the Sept. 11 strike in Benghazi, Libya, a "spontaneous" response to an anti-Islamic movie trailer and not a pre-planned or terrorist attack.  

"It seems that with each passing day, the situation surrounding the administration's response to the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya becomes more bizarre. The United States Congress and the American people are still waiting to get straight answers," Corker wrote in the letter dated Sept. 29.

Clapper on Friday called the strike a "deliberate and carefully planned terrorist attack."

The administration's responses on Sept. 16 came from U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, whom the administration has repeatedly said gave answers based on the best information available.

Still, Rep. Peter King, the New York Republican who heads the House Homeland Security Committee, on Friday called for Rice to resign over her "misleading" statements.

Corker also joins in the growing concern about whether the consulate, as well as U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and the three other Americans killed, had adequate security and why FBI investigators have yet to reach the crime scene.

"Yet just 18 days ago the administration apparently judged that it was appropriate for our consulate to be lightly guarded and it was safe for our ambassador to come through the city with a small security detail," Corker wrote. "What has changed in Libya in such a short time that even FBI agents, our most elite investigative personnel, cannot safely enter the city? What has led to such a precipitous decline?"

Republican Sens. John McCain (Ariz.), Lindsey Graham  (S.C.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), and Ron Johnson (Wis.), also sent letters last week demanding more detailed answers, including one to Rice seeking clarification on her statements.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Many Iraq, Afghanistan war veterans choosing 'second service' by going into politics

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Many Iraq, Afghanistan war veterans choosing 'second service' by going into politics
Sep 30th 2012, 15:02

RALEIGH, N.C. –  The link between U.S. military service and running for office is as old as the republic itself. It started with George Washington, who famously wrote that, "When we assumed the Soldier, we did not lay aside the Citizen."

During the long wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, hundreds of thousands of veterans have come home and laid aside their uniforms. But not all have opted to simply blend back into civilian life.

Many have chosen to run for public office.

Several dozen veterans -- some of them from earlier wars -- are vying for U.S. House and Senate seats this year. And many others are seeking state and local offices across the country. Men and women, Republicans and Democrats, they range from well-known hopefuls such as congressional candidate Tammy Duckworth in Illinois, who became a double amputee when her National Guard helicopter was shot down in Iraq, to Arizona state House contender Mark Cardenas, a 25-year-old Iraq vet who remains a National Guardsman.

They are people like former Marine tank commander Nick Popaditch, who lost his right eye during the April 2004 Battle of Fallujah in Iraq, and who is now the Republican nominee in California's 53rd Congressional District.

"I was looking at my government and I wasn't happy with it," says the ex-gunnery sergeant, who cuts a striking figure on the campaign trail with his shaved head and black eye patch. "So rather than complain, I decided to run myself. I thought I could do a better job, and I still feel that way."

After back-to-back wars, there are more recent combat veterans in the United States today than at any time since Vietnam.

But the number of former military members in public office has been declining for years. In 1969, nearly 90 percent of all U.S. House and Senate seats were held by people who'd served in uniform. Today, says the Congressional Research Service, it's about 20 percent. And for the first time in decades, none of the major party candidates for president and vice president has been in the military.

Seth Lynn thinks that's one of the problems with our political system these days, and he's working to change that.

Lynn, a Naval Academy graduate who spent six years in the Marines, helped found Veterans Campaign to train former service members interested in running for office.

He notes that as the number of veterans on Capitol Hill has dropped, there has been "an almost parallel decrease in America's confidence in Congress."

"I'm not saying that the two are necessarily a causal relationship," says Lynn. "But I do think that there is that ability to put your country before yourself, but also to work together across party lines, that Americans want more that just isn't happening in Washington."

There is a natural ebb and flow to this nexus between military and public service.

When World War II ended, 16 million men and women had served in uniform around the globe, and as a result postwar politicians were often veterans. The pool of veterans grew smaller in following years, especially since the end of the military draft in 1973.

The all-volunteer military engenders a sense of duty and "selflessness" that Lynn and others feel has been sorely lacking in the political arena. He sees this quality as a motivation for veteran-candidates today.

Even though he lost a Sept. 6 Democratic primary for a Massachusetts state Senate seat, Joe Kearns Goodwin says he's more convinced than ever "that a life of service is a very worthy one."

Goodwin was a new Harvard graduate when, following the Sept. 11 attacks, he announced he was enlisting in the Army.

His parents "thought I was totally insane" then and were surprised again when he declared he was running for office. But they shouldn't have been, given the family's proximity to politics. His mother is Doris Kearns Goodwin, the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian, and his father, Richard Goodwin, was an adviser and speechwriter for Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.

"I was weaned on stories of the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, the Great Society, the New Frontier," says the 34-year-old Goodwin. His father worked on these issues, he noted, "all of which represented the ability of government to do good, when it's done well."

Goodwin served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, and rose to the rank of captain. "Before we went on patrol, nobody asked, `Are you a Democrat or a Republican?"' he says. "No one asked if you were from a blue state or a red state, a progressive or a conservative. We were just, `What do we need to do to get the job done?"'

In California, Popaditch is making his second run for Congress -- but were it not for a rocket-propelled grenade, he'd most likely still be wearing a uniform.

The son of a Korean War veteran, Popaditch turned down a college scholarship to join the Marines. In the first Gulf War, he commanded a tank during the invasion of Iraq. He left the Marines after six years, but re-enlisted in 1995 and went through training as a drill instructor. After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Popaditch asked to be reassigned to tanks.

He took part in the second Iraq invasion in 2003. On April 7, 2004, his tank was struck by an RPG, shrapnel carving a path through his sinuses and destroying his right eye. His actions earned him a Silver Star and a Purple Heart but cost him his career.

Like former U.S. Sen. Bob Dole and other wounded vets before him, Popaditch used the GI Bill to go back to school. Last year, he graduated magna cum laude from San Diego State University with a degree in teaching.

Misgivings about the country's direction troubled Popaditch while an undergraduate, prompting his unsuccessful 2010 congressional race. He has put his studies toward a master's on hold this year to run again.

"I think things are slipping," he says. "And they will continue to slip if we don't get involved."

Tom Cotton, the Republican nominee in Arkansas' 4th Congressional District race, compared his decision to run with his decision to join the Army in 2005.

"At that time, it was an attack from a foreign enemy, and we were in an active war. And now we're in a debt crisis that threatens our future prosperity and, therefore, ultimately freedom," says Cotton, 35, who declined a commission as a legal officer to go into the infantry.

Cotton served tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, then left a position as a management consultant to run for office. He says the skills he developed in the military have served him well in the business world, as well as on the campaign trail.

"The constant ability to prioritize and reprioritize tasks, to work with imperfect information, to handle ambiguity, to build coalitions to reach a common goal," says Cotton, who defeated a fellow veteran in his primary race. "Being part of a team and helping lead a team by purpose and motivation and direction so it can accomplish more than the individual could accomplish on his or her own."

For many veteran-candidates, their military service is front and center -- but that carries risks.

Running against Cotton for the open 4th District seat is longtime Arkansas state Sen. Gene Jeffress, a retired school teacher.

"I appreciate ALL of our veterans, and I respect them," says Jeffress. "But I think it's been overdone. If he (Cotton) hadn't have had that, I don't know what else he would have had to run on."

In Illinois, Duckworth's opponent, Republican incumbent Rep. Joe Walsh, said her service -- which cost her both legs and partial use of one arm -- demands respect. "However," he added, "unlike most veterans I have had the honor to meet since my election to Congress, who rarely, if ever, talk about their service or the combat they've seen, that is darn near all of what Tammy Duckworth talks about."

Lynn says the "single biggest pitfall" veteran candidates face is overestimating the power of the war-service narrative. The "Candidate's Field Manual" developed for Veterans Campaign hammers that point home.

John F. Kennedy's World War II heroics after the sinking of PT 109 might have helped him in the close 1960 presidential race against Richard Nixon, but George McGovern's bombing runs over Europe in same war didn't lift him over Nixon in 1972, the manual notes. By the same token, allegations of draft dodging and preferential treatment during the Vietnam War didn't stop Bill Clinton and George W. Bush from becoming two-term presidents.

Vietnam veteran John Kerry's failed 2004 presidential campaign introduced a new verb to the political lexicon: to be "swiftboated," a reference to the members of his river boat crew who came out to question his war record.

"A DD-214 (military discharge form) is not an ironclad guarantee to winning office," the manual says -- but it adds that military credentials, "wielded with care," can help.

"All things being equal," says Lynn, "being a veteran of the Iraq or Afghanistan wars today is a greater benefit to a politician than being a veteran of Vietnam 40 years ago."

Mark Cardenas, who recently won his Arizona state House Democratic primary and is unopposed in the general election, was reluctant to play off his veteran status.

The son of Mexican immigrants, he didn't see many options when he graduated from high school. But he knew that if he joined the Army, "I'd have the GI Bill. ... It's something that I had to do to get ahead in life."

But supporters urged him to make more of his veteran status, he says, telling him, "That's your credibility right there."

The youngest candidate in his district, he says his Iraq tour came in handy when questions arose about his youth or his experience.

"Well, for one thing, I'm the only person (in the race) that's ever had an AK-47 shot at them in anger," says Cardenas, whose stint in the National Guard won't end until nearly two weeks after the Nov. 6 election.

Cardenas was among the first graduates from one of Lynn's boot camps in 2009. The program has since blossomed into the George Washington University Center for Second Service, of which Lynn is now director.

Lynn says nearly 60 veterans have won their primaries for the U.S. House and Senate. Not all are recent veterans.

Another of Lynn's alumni is Blair Milo. At 29, she has been an anti-submarine warfare officer and lived aboard Iraqi oil platforms in the North Arabian Gulf; at the Pentagon, she worked on the program to develop the Navy's latest stealth destroyer. She's still a lieutenant in the Navy Reserves.

In 2010, the ROTC graduate from Purdue University was home in La Porte, Ind., on "terminal leave" and trying to figure out what to do with the rest of her life. The local newspaper was full of stories about the city's fiscal crisis.

Milo wrote a series of guest columns, offering solutions. Before she knew it, she'd been recruited to run for mayor. Challenging the two-term Democratic incumbent, she won.

The city of 22,000 continues to borrow money to meet its obligations, but Milo says things are improving. She's focusing her efforts on economic development and has even invited residents to join her for a weekly 5k run. About 250 people now participate in Fitness Friday.

"I like my job -- MOST days," Milo says.

It's important, Lynn says, for vet-candidates to make it clear that they won't be fixated simply on military issues.

After more than two decades in the Army, those issues are certainly close to Steve Wilkins' heart. But the retired lieutenant colonel says that's not why he's seeking to unseat Rep. Renee Ellmers, a tea party favorite, in North Carolina's 2nd Congressional District.

Wilkins, who served as Gen. David Petraeus' logistics chief during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, says there's a tendency to see military people as all moving in "lockstep." In his 22 years of service, he found that there was room for disagreement and discussion.

But at the end of the day, the Democratic nominee says, "there has to be some kind of compromise."

"I've been distressed at looking at the political environment right now, how divisive it is and how our political leaders, particularly in the Congress, just don't seem to be getting anything done," Wilkins says. "There's more of a focus on waiting each other out to see who can have a stronger upper hand before doing anything.

"And I just don't think that's in the spirit of our democracy," he says. "Things have got to get done to advance the football down the field."

In that respect, Wilkins says, government could stand a little more military discipline.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Ryan: 'We're going to win this race'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ryan: 'We're going to win this race'
Sep 30th 2012, 13:36

Republican vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan on Sunday brushed aside recent polls showing President Obama leading Mitt Romney, saying, "We're going to win this race."

Ryan said on "Fox News Sunday" that the presidential debates starting Wednesday will show Romney as "a clear choice we're offering."

"Stagnation vs. growth … that's the classic choice being offered," said Ryan, R-Wis. "That's what we hope people get out of debate."

Still, Ryan acknowledged, "I don't think one event is going to make or break a campaign."

With five weeks before Election Day, Romney and Ryan are facing sharp criticism about why they are not leading in polls amid high unemployment and sluggish Gross Domestic Product, numbers that have historically sunk presidents seeking re-election.

Ryan argued that the Obama campaign has done a good job of "distracting people" and suggested that the so-called "mainstream media" has helped the president's re-election effort.

He also confirmed that Romney is set this week to deliver a major foreign speech and disagreed with the assertion that the debate message of a "clear choice" is the departure from the earlier campaign message that the race is a referendum on Obama's past four years.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Solar power company banks on loan, but skeptics question government investment in industry

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Solar power company banks on loan, but skeptics question government investment in industry
Sep 30th 2012, 13:22

The federal government is making another big bet on solar panel manufacturing with taxpayer money, hoping the third time will be the charm.

SoloPower held its grand opening Thursday in Portland, Ore., with speeches from local politicians and a ribbon-cutting. "It really revolutionizes rooftop applications, and it makes solar both easy and cost effective for nearly any commercial and industrial building worldwide," CEO Tim Harris said.

SoloPower closed on a guaranteed government loan of $197 million last August, about the time another solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, filed for bankruptcy. The failure of Solyndra cost U.S. taxpayers more than a half-billion dollars.

The second solar panel maker that received a loan from the Department of Energy, Abound, is also now in bankruptcy. Based in Longmont, Colo., Abound spent $70 million of its green energy loan and next week will auction off its equipment in hopes of paying some of that back.

Industry analysts are not optimistic about SoloPower's prospects.

"It's questionable at this point," says Andrew Soare of Lux Research, "It's uncertain if solar power will be able to produce efficiently and economically at scale. It's something that has not been done yet, and it's still risky."

Soare points to the price advantage enjoyed by Chinese manufacturers which has helped them grab a majority of the U.S. market share. Chinese solar panels are about 30 percent cheaper than ones made in America. The Commerce Department is urging President Obama to slap a tariff on Chines imports.

But SoloPower doesn't view China as competitors because they make far different products. SoloPower manufacturers "thin film," flexible and lightweight panels that can be installed on large commercial and industrial rooftops.

Environmental groups continue to support the federal green power loan program.

"We're just on the cusp of a whole revolution," says Ross Macfarlane of Climate Solutions. "Many (companies) will fail, but the key ones will succeed and they're going to lead us."

But William Yeatman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute says the Energy Department's green loan program created with federal stimulus money has been a failure by any measure. Congress appropriated $4.5 billion for it. Solar panel bankruptcies alone have cost taxpayers $600 million and if SoloPower stumbles, the losses will go even higher. A fourth company, 1366 Technologies, received a $150 million loan but has not even built its manufacturing plant yet.

Yeatman has little faith in SoloPower: "It looks like it will fail for the same reasons as Solyndra."

Much of the debate following Solyndra's collapse has centered on government's role in emerging technologies. Green groups say government has supported the oil industry through tax breaks, so it's essential to help alternative fuels to wean us off carbon.

But John Charles of the Cascade Policy Institute said government just gets in the way.

"It's a terrible risk," Charles said. "This is a program that should not even exist, even if the risk was low. It is not a proper function of government to be a venture capital fund."

SoloPower expects to start spending the taxpayer money late this year.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Presidential candidates' deficit plans don't add up, analysts say

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Presidential candidates' deficit plans don't add up, analysts say
Sep 30th 2012, 12:17

As the government closes the books Sunday with a $1.1 trillion deficit for the year, which required borrowing 32 cents for every dollar it spent, budget analysts have little confidence in either presidential candidate's plan to address the accumulating debt, now at about $16 trillion.

Mitt Romney promises to balance the budget in eight years to 10 years, but he also offers a mix of budgetary contradictions: higher Pentagon spending, restoring cuts that Democrats made in Medicare and an absolute refusal to consider tax increases.

To fulfill his promise, Romney would require cuts to other programs so deep -- under one calculation requiring cutting many areas of the domestic budget by one-third within four years -- that they could never get through Congress.

President Obama claims more than $4 trillion in deficit savings over the coming decade. But it you peel away accounting tricks and debatable claims on spending cuts, it's more like $1.1 trillion. Republicans say it's even less because of creative bookkeeping used to mask spending on Medicare reimbursements to doctors.

The accounting gets tricky, but the biggest faults with Obama's math are his claims of more than $2 trillion in savings from earlier budget deals with Republicans and an additional $848 billion in savings from winding down of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"You can't find a $4 trillion number," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a conservative who once led the Congressional Budget Office.

Obama promises relatively small cuts of $597 billion from big federal benefit programs such as Medicare and Medicaid over the next decade while proposing tax increases of $1.9 trillion that he couldn't push through Congress when Democrats controlled both the House and Senate.

Obama's performance on the deficit should be his Achilles heel. The deficit has exceeded $1 trillion each year on his watch. He gave a cold shoulder to his own special deficit commission. Whatever efforts have occurred over the past two years to curb the deficit have come under pressure by Republicans.

"The American people see the financial chaos. They know it must stop. They know their families are at risk, and that their country is in danger," Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said in a recent GOP radio address. "Yet the president does not rally the country to action. Instead, he says our debt course is nothing to worry about."

Romney offers a set of principles and promises rather than a detailed plan. He pledges to shrink the government to 20 percent of the size of the economy, as opposed to more than 23 percent of gross domestic product now, by the end of his first term. The Romney campaign estimates that would require cuts of $500 billion from the 2016 budget alone.

Romney proposes saving hundreds of billions of dollars over the coming decade by following House Republicans' plan to sharply cut federal spending on Medicaid health care for the poor and disabled, and turn it over to state governments. He pledges to cut the federal workforce by 10 percent.

But Romney also promises large budget increases for the Pentagon and rejects a plan by his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., that endorses more than $700 billion in cuts to Medicare that were made as part of Obama's health care law. Social Security is off the table.

That means big cuts to what's left over: nuts-and-bolts government agencies including the FBI, Federal Aviation Administration and Border Patrol; programs such as food inspection and space exploration; and popular subsidy and benefit programs for farmers, veterans and college students.

The liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities calculates that Romney's budget outline could require a one-third cut in domestic programs by 2016, excluding Social Security and Medicare, to make the math work. By 2022, such programs would have to be cut by more than half.

"You have to have large cuts in the rest of the non-defense budget, very large cuts," said Paul Van De Water, an analyst at the budget think tank. "Whether it's politically and practically achievable is subject to question."

Romney also is light on details on his tax cut proposal.

He says he wants to cut rates by 20 percent, but won't specify how he'll find the $5 trillion required to pay for it. For all the rhetoric of tax loopholes and cleaning up the tax code, finding that kind of money would require looking at popular deductions and tax breaks for the middle class. Those include deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and state and local taxes, and breaks for college savings, employer-paid health insurance and families with children.

Tax experts say he could very well come up short.

Obama's budget has a lengthy and detailed mix of initiatives. But other than raising $1.4 trillion over a decade by allowing George W. Bush-era tax cuts on family income exceeding $250,000 to expire, they're mostly small-bore ideas.

There's little in the way of political danger. For instance, his budget would permit the cost of both Medicare and Medicaid to double over the coming decade. He offers cuts to health care providers, but asks no sacrifice from beneficiaries.

In private negotiations last year with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, that failed, Obama displayed some willingness to take on Medicare's problems by raising from 65 the age to qualify for benefits. A "grand bargain" to get the debt under control would require him to go further.

"What he's put on the table is insufficient to get us to the goal," said Robert Reischauer, a former Urban Institute president and one-time director of the Congressional Budget Office who is one of the trustees for who oversee Social Security and Medicare. "He's going to have to ramp up the game after the election if he really wants to stabilize the debt in a reasonable length of time."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Defense cuts poised to deal billions of dollars in damage to contractor-heavy states

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Defense cuts poised to deal billions of dollars in damage to contractor-heavy states
Sep 30th 2012, 13:22

Defense contractors are bracing for a blow to business should Congress fail to avert massive automatic budget cuts come January. 

And newly emerging studies are starting to show which states will be hit hardest. For some, the budget ax amounts to billions of dollars in lost income over the next decade. 

"(The cuts) will cause dramatic program and personnel dislocation within our industry," Lockheed Martin CEO Robert Stevens said in a recent statement. 

Lockheed Martin is headquartered in Bethesda, Md., and Maryland is one of several states expected to take a heavy hit. 

The Center for Security Policy recently outlined, state by state, the potential impact of the cuts. The five that would be hit worst are Virginia, California, Texas, Maryland and Florida. 

In Virginia, defense contractors could be looking at a $9.9 billion hit every year -- that includes the impact of both the so-called "sequestration" cuts and budget cuts already planned that likely will not be averted. According to the study, that could mean more than 122,000 private-sector jobs. 

In California, the projected impact is $7.9 billion. In Texas, it's $6.5 billion. 

The "sequestration" cuts are what lawmakers and contractors are all worried about. They were triggered by lawmakers' failure to reach a deficit-reduction plan on their own, following last summer's deal to raise the nation's debt limit. 

For the time being, contractors are anxiously awaiting the post-election lame-duck session of Congress, seen as the last and best chance for something to be done to delay or avert the budget cuts. But if Congress does nothing, then more than $500 billion in defense cuts over the next decade are set to go into effect. On top of that are another $500 billion in non-defense cuts. 

According to an estimate over the summer by a George Mason University scholar, the defense portion of that could cost more than 1 million jobs over the next decade. 

Contractors are warning that the job-loss potential is no bluff. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., maker of the Black Hawk helicopter, recently announced the elimination of 570 jobs, from the closure of a plant in upstate New York. 

And Northrop Grumman recently announced it was cutting 600 aerospace jobs 

"Who knows what's going to happen," said Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers. "On the defense side, there are quite a number of states that will be impacted." 

Pattison said the defense cuts won't just hit the companies -- they'll hit, over time, the budgets of the states that rely on tax revenue from those companies. 

"Tough decisions will have to be made at the state level to determine do you raise taxes? Do you continue to cut?" he said. 

But for now, Congress is at a stalemate, and the issue is more of a political football than anything else. Democrats blame Republicans for their stubbornness on raising taxes. Republicans blame Democrats for their stubbornness on cutting entitlements. And if lawmakers can work together to avert the cuts, budget hawks want to make sure Congress doesn't balk on achieving the $1.2 trillion in total deficit reduction. 

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has been pleading with Congress to work it out. 

"You want a strong national defense for this country? I need to have some stability," Panetta said Thursday. "That's what I'm asking the Congress to do. Get me some stability with regards to the funding of the Defense Department for the future."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Saturday, September 29, 2012

FOXNews.com: Washington state Board of Education pushes schools to replace their Native American mascots.

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Washington state Board of Education pushes schools to replace their Native American mascots.
Sep 30th 2012, 04:49

The state Board of Education is making another attempt at encouraging Washington schools to replace their Native American mascots.

In the past decade, about 10 schools have given up their Indian mascots. But another 50, including tribal schools, are holding fast to their nicknames as warriors, braves, redskins and red devils.

The state board passed a resolution on Wednesday urging districts to stop using Native American mascots, but as board spokesman Aaron Wyatt acknowledges, it does not have the authority to mandate this change.

There are no consequences for schools that do not voluntarily choose a new mascot, Wyatt said Friday.

Oregon's state Board of Education voted in May to ban Native American mascots, nicknames and logos. Schools in that state have five years to comply. Eight Oregon high schools are affected.

Washington's resolution, which is similar to resolution passed by the board in 1993, was inspired by research by the American Psychological Association citing the adverse effects of Native American mascots on students.

The resolution also mentions the widening achievement gap between Native American and other students and the call by a number of national organizations and tribes for this change.

"We are in the business of educating students," Board member Bernal Baca said in a statement. "We need to remove any barrier that will impede student success."

Marcus Morgan, superintendent of the Reardan-Edwall School District near Spokane, said the issued hadn't been raised during his tenure with the school district but was open to the idea of discussing now.

All of Reardan's sports teams are the Indians and about a quarter of the district population are Native American or Alaskan Native students.

"I think it's maybe time to ask the questions," Morgan said Friday.

He said he would probably make some calls to tribal leaders as well as the school board and other community leaders to see if this is an issue the community wants to tackle.

Reardan schools have a long tradition of Native American students, as well as having enthusiastic sports fans, Morgan said. He doesn't think the Indian mascot has been seen as derogatory, but he added that the issue deserved more research.

Other Washington communities have had acrimonious battles over retiring a Native American mascot, including some districts close to Reardan. The Colville Indians asked the Colville High School Indians to find a new name in 1997, but they're still the Indians today.

Ten schools have changed their names in the past decade, including Eatonville Middle School, which went from the Warriors to the Eagles; Eisenhower Middle School in Everett, which went from the Warriors to the Patriots and Issaquah High School, which changed from the Indians to the Eagles.

About 10 tribal schools or those on Washington reservations also have Native American mascots, but the majority of schools in the state with Indian mascots are part of their community's long-standing history.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Former NY Gov. David Paterson and wife split

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Former NY Gov. David Paterson and wife split
Sep 30th 2012, 04:10

Published September 30, 2012

Associated Press

  • New York Gov. David Paterson

    New York Gov. David Paterson speaks during a news conference at Terminal 4 of JFK airport Friday, March 5, 2010 in New York. (AP)

NEW YORK –  Former New York Gov. David Paterson and his wife have separated.

The split between the Democratic politician and wife Michelle Paige Paterson was first reported Saturday by the New York Post. Paterson representative Sean Darcy says the couple's decision was "mutual and amicable."

The couple's relationship was in the public eye from the day he took office in 2008. He immediately admitted one affair in an interview and the next day appeared at a press conference with his wife, where both admitted having affairs at a time when their marriage was heading toward divorce.

The revelations followed on the heels of the sex scandal that felled Paterson's predecessor. Democratic Gov. Eliot Spitzer resigned from office after he was accused of spending thousands of dollars on high-end prostitutes.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.