Saturday, June 30, 2012

FOXNews.com: Mississippi to become only state without abortion clinic?

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mississippi to become only state without abortion clinic?
Jun 30th 2012, 21:00

JACKSON, Mississippi –  Mississippi soon could become the only U.S. state without an abortion clinic as a new law takes effect this weekend. Critics say it would force women in one of the country's poorest states to drive hours to obtain a constitutionally protected procedure or carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

Top officials say limiting abortions is exactly what they have in mind.

Republican Gov. Phil Bryant says he wants Mississippi to be "abortion-free." The law takes effect Sunday.

Abortion rights supporters have sued, asking a judge to temporarily block the law from taking effect. So far, that hasn't happened.

The law requires anyone performing abortions at the state's only clinic to be a doctor with privileges to admit patients to a local hospital. Such privileges can be difficult to obtain, and the clinic contends the mandate is designed to put it out of business. A clinic spokeswoman, Betty Thompson, has said the two physicians who do abortions there travel to the clinic from other states.

Michelle Movahed of the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights is one of the attorneys representing the clinic. She said Friday that several states -- including Mississippi, Kansas and Oklahoma -- have tried in the past few years to chip away at access to abortion.

"One of the things that has really been surprising about Mississippi is how open the legislators and elected officials have been about their intentions," Movahed said. "They're not even pretending it's about public safety. They're openly saying they're using this law to try to shut down the last abortion provider in the state."

Religious-affiliated hospitals might not grant admitting privileges to those who perform elective abortions, while other hospitals might not grant them to out-of-state physicians who travel to work at the clinic, Jackson Women's Health Organization. As of Friday, the final business day before the new law takes effect, physicians at the clinic had applied for admitting privileges but hadn't received them.

Supporters of the new law said they believe it will be safer for a woman who develops complications if the same doctor who does an abortion at a clinic can accompany her to a hospital rather than handing her case over to another physician. The clinic says the admitting privileges are not medically necessary as complications from abortion are rare.

Outside the clinic in the state capital one day last week, at least a dozen people from a local church sang hymns and prayed for an end to abortion. Among them was 51-year-old Patricia Frazier, who showed off a rubber model of a fetus at about 12 weeks' development -- about the length of a grown woman's index finger.

"This is all about money. They want your money," Frazier said, nodding toward the clinic.

The state Health Department website shows 2,297 abortions, listed as "induced terminations," were performed in Mississippi in 2010, the most recent year for which statistics were available. The vast majority of those -- 2,251 -- were performed on Mississippi residents. The site does not specify how many were done at the clinic and how many were done in other offices or hospitals.

Clinic operators say almost all the abortions in the state are done in their building.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama's fundraising pitches sounding more poor mouth that powerful

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama's fundraising pitches sounding more poor mouth that powerful
Jun 30th 2012, 20:06

President Obama, the most prolific fundraiser in U.S. presidential campaign history, returned Saturday to a fundraising strategy that increasingly appears more like tin cup rattling.

Since losing the monthly fundraising battle for the first time, in May, to Mitt Romney, the president appears to have changed his fundraising strategy to suggest he's just trying to keep pace.

"We might not out raise Mitt Romney," the president said Saturday in an email to supporters. "But I am determined to keep the margin close enough that we can win this election the right way."

The roughly $750 million raised by the Obama campaign during the 2008 election cycle essentially broke every fundraising record, including the most money and most donors.

The campaign accomplished that feat in large part by soliciting and collect donations under $200 – many of them through the Internet and such social media outlets such as Facebook and MySpace, which was relatively innovative at the time.  

Obama also eschews public financing to avoid the related spending limits, making him the first major-party candidate to reject taxpayer money for the general election since the system was instituted roughly 40 years ago.

In May, the joint fundraising effort Romney and the Republicans National Committee known as Romney Victory raised $76.8 million, roughly $16 million more than the Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Supreme Court ruling results in 'colorful' responses from Democrats and Republicans

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Supreme Court ruling results in 'colorful' responses from Democrats and Republicans
Jun 30th 2012, 16:18

The Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act resulted immediately in serious discussions about taxes, mandates and the presidential campaigns. But it also brought a flurry of responses from Democrats and Republican using dicey language.

"Let's win the damn election," Jim Messina, President Obama's campaign manager, wrote to supporters Thursday after the decision.

Messina said the high court decision resulted in a "good day" for Democrats and others backing the president's re-election effort but added that one final step remains in making sure Obama's signature legislation stays in place.

"Step three? Win the damn election," he wrote before asking for a $3 donation.

His email was preceded by a profanity-laced one by Patrick Gaspard, executive director of the Democratic National Committee, which resulted in an apparent apology.

"It's constitutional. B----es " Gaspard, also a former director of the Office of Political Affairs for the Obama administration, tweeted about an hour after the Thursday morning court decision.

He later tweeted: "I let my excitement get the better of me. In all seriousness, this is an important moment in improving the lives of all Americans."

Republicans also got involved.

"This is a big (expletive) tax," declared the National Republican Congressional Committee, riffing on a comment Vice President Joe Biden made in 2010 when the president publically signed the heath care bill into law and that was caught on an open microphone.

"This is a big (expletive) deal," Biden said.

The RNCC's message is posted on the group's Facebook page under a picture of Biden making his infamous statement into the president's ear before a live TV audience.

The high court decision stated in part the consequence for Americans not buying health insurance will be a tax, not a penalty.

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney stayed on message, vowing if elected to repeal the law.

"What the court did not do on its last day in session, I will do on my first day if elected," he said. "I will act to repel ObamaCare."

Romney estimates the law will raise taxes on Americans by $500 billion.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: GOP backer, casino mogul Adelson reportedly gave $10 M to Koch brothers' efforts

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
GOP backer, casino mogul Adelson reportedly gave $10 M to Koch brothers' efforts
Jun 30th 2012, 18:28

Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson has donated $10 million to the Koch brothers' efforts to elect Republicans and ouster President Obama and other Democrats -- forging perhaps the most powerful, well-financed political fundraising machine of 2012.

Adelson donated the money last weekend during a Koch brothers' fundraising summit in suburban San Diego. The private deal was confirmed Friday, according to the Associated Press and other news agencies.

Adelson has already contributed $10 million to Restore Our Future, which is the super political action committee that backs GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney, and $5 million each to two organizations promoting House Republicans.

During the GOP presidential primary, Adelson, chief executive officer of the Las Vegas Sands, and family members gave $21 million to a super PAC promoting former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Charles and David Koch are billionaire oil executives and libertarians who founded the small-government, anti-tax group Americans for Prosperity.

Among the others who contributed at the summit was personal-investment tycoon Charles Schwab, who committed to a seven-figure donation. Also at the summit, the brothers announced a new candidate training academy, Grassroots Institute, according to POLITICO.

The Kochs reportedly also are behind a voter database called Themis, similar to the Democrats' Catalist, and their network of groups is expected to spend roughly $400 million in this election cycle.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Health law battle enters round 2

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Health law battle enters round 2
Jun 30th 2012, 17:20

A new front has opened in efforts to reshape how the federal government implements President Barack Obama's health-care overhaul now that the Supreme Court has ruled to keep the law in place.

Employers, insurers, hospitals, drug makers and others are angling for an advantage as the government writes the regulations and sets the policies that will bring the law to life, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Hospital owners want the government to reduce the $155 billion in health-care payment cuts they agreed to during negotiations over the law. Makers of medical devices hope to roll back a 2.3 percent tax on their sales contained in the measure. Insurance companies want more leeway to charge older people higher rates than younger ones. Drug makers are aiming at a provision that could squeeze how much Medicare pays for medicine.

"Let's face it, this law is going to be amended and adjusted for years and years to come," said Rick Pollack, executive vice president of the American Hospital Association, a lobbying group.

The White House gave lobbyists fresh hope that they can win changes to the law after Obama said Thursday he wanted to improve the overhaul. Although the legislation Obama signed in 2010 spells out most aspects of the law, federal officials can materially change it depending on how they write regulations to implement each provision.

Click here to read more:

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Officer fatally shot by solider at Fort Bragg was highly decorated war veteran

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Officer fatally shot by solider at Fort Bragg was highly decorated war veteran
Jun 30th 2012, 14:28

Army officials released the name of the officer fatally shot by a soldier under his command at Fort Bragg Thursday, and said he was a highly-decorated veteran of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  

The superior officer killed has been identified as Lt. Col. Roy L. Tisdale, a Bronze Star Medal recipient and commander of the 525th Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 525th Battlefield Surveillance Brigade.

Tisdale, 42, was from Alvin, Texas. 

He was shot allegedly by a member of his battalion during a safety briefing near the unit's headquarters.

Tisdale died immediately, then the shooter reportedly turned the weapon on himself.

The shooter, who has not been identified, is also not expected to survive his self-inflicted wound, a senior defense official told Fox News. 

The suspect was facing a possible court martial for allegedly stealing a toolbox worth $2,000 from a military facility, the official said.

A third soldier wounded during the shooting has been released from the hospital. He has been identified as 22-year-old Spc. Michael E. Latham of Vacaville, Calif.

Tisdale graduated from Texas A&M University in 1993 and was commissioned as an infantry officer. He took command of the battalion in January 2012 when the battalion was activated.

Among Tisdale's awards and decorations are a Purple Heart, a Meritorious Service Medal and a Senior Parachutist Badge.

The alleged shooter had served in Afghanistan as part of Col. Tisdale's security, the official told Fox News.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: AP source: Adelson giving $10 million to aid GOP

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
AP source: Adelson giving $10 million to aid GOP
Jun 30th 2012, 12:46

Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson is making another huge campaign contribution aimed at electing Republicans and voting President Barack Obama out of office.

One of the world's richest men, Adelson is donating $10 million to the campaign activities of the billionaire Koch brothers. A person familiar with Adelson's pledge confirmed the donation Friday, requesting anonymity to discuss the private arrangement.

Adelson has already contributed $10 million to a super political action committee that backs likely Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Restore Our Future, and $5 million to each of two organizations promoting House Republicans.

During the GOP presidential primary, Adelson and members of his family gave $21 million to a super PAC promoting former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Oil executives Charles and David Koch founded small-government, anti-tax group Americans for Prosperity.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Democratic convention changes renew concerns about financial risk to backers

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Democratic convention changes renew concerns about financial risk to backers
Jun 30th 2012, 07:30

The decision this week by the host committee of the Democratic National Convention to scrap a major event has sparked new concerns about the committee's financial situation -- including a $10 million line of credit and a utility company's connection to the deal.

Stimulus-backed Duke Energy Corp. last year agreed to guarantee the line of credit for the party affair. This decision was a big help for the organizers, as the credit line was required by the Democratic National Committee. But it also came with a risk for Duke Energy's shareholders. 

If the host committee defaults, the shareholders, and not ratepayers, would be on the hook for the loss. 

"It's clear the convention is facing some economic uncertainty," said Tom Borelli a senior fellow at the conservative FreedomWorks, who complained that the deal has left shareholders at risk even though they did not make the decision to guarantee the credit line. 

That call was made by CEO Jim Rogers. Rogers is also a leading fundraiser for the Sept. 4-6 convention in Charlotte, N.C.

But Duke Energy spokesman Tom Williams said Duke Energy has "no concerns" about the money being repaid.

A Charlotte in 2012 spokeswoman also told FoxNews.com on Wednesday the group has not yet used the line of credit, but that it exists for its intended purpose – "to use if we need it and pay back."

She also said fundraising efforts are on track and reiterated that logistics, including access to public transportation, was the reason for moving the opening day event from the Charlotte Motor Speedway to downtown. 

The announcement, though, about plans to move opening day events follows a report that the host committee has so far raised only $10 million -- roughly $26.65 million less than required in its contract. 

Borelli also expressed concern about the credit deal and the connections among related parties, which he says smack of "crony capitalism."

Beyond Rogers having already raised a reported $52 million for the host committee, the energy company received $200 million in Obama administration stimulus money in May 2010.

In addition, Fifth Third Bancorp., parent company of the bank extending the credit, received $3.4 billion during the height of the financial crisis from the federal government's $700 billion financial industry bailout. 

Rogers also is listed as a member of Fifth Third's board of directors.

The $36.65 million goal at the Democratic convention is for convention costs including accommodating the media and making improvements to the Time Warner Cable Arena where President Obama is scheduled to give his acceptance speech when officially nominated to be the party's presidential candidate.

Borelli and others are not implying that Rogers and Duke Energy are doing something illegal. But they think the company -- which has raised $405,000 for Democrats so far this election cycle -- is indeed looking for political favor.  

David Swindell, a University of North Carolina policy expert, previously told the Charlotte Observer such support can only help the utility in seeking energy subsidies from the Obama administration.

Borelli points out Rogers lobbied unsuccessfully in support of the administration's failed cap-and-trade legislation and claimed he would continue to foster a relationship with the administration should Obama win re-election.

"I think he's trying to suck up," Borelli said.

Williams, though, said the decision for the company to be the guarantor was an effort to bring the convention to Charlotte to generate economic opportunity. And he argued the company made a similar but more preliminary attempt in 2000 to bring the Republican National Convention to the city.

Shelton Ehrlich, a stockholder in Duke Energy, which has coal-fired plants, said Rogers' support of cap-and-trade legislation is the consequence of political pressure, and a mistake, perhaps in hindsight.

The legislation "would destroy a good number of jobs," said Ehrlich, also an engineer. "Nobody could have assumed an Environmental Protection Agency that would ban new coal plants and shut down those that needed improvement."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Friday, June 29, 2012

FOXNews.com: White House pulls Netherlands ambassador nominee

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
White House pulls Netherlands ambassador nominee
Jun 30th 2012, 01:41

The White House pulled its April 26 nomination of Washington attorney Timothy Broas as ambassador to the Netherlands on Thursday.

The move came after Broas was allegedly charged with drunk driving and resisting arrest in Maryland last week, the Center for Public Integrity's website iWatchNews.org reported. 

Broas is a top Obama campaign fundraiser.

According to the Obama campaign, Broas has helped raise more than $500,000 for the 2012 reelection effort. By law, Broas cannot contribute all that money himself -- so he, like other so-called "bundlers" serves as a fundraising point person and collects money from others to donate to the campaign. 

These bundlers are frequently rewarded with prestigious positions -- in the administrations of President Obama as well as his predecessors. The Center for Responsive Politics estimated that Obama nominated two-dozen fundraisers to ambassador positions within his first year in office. 

Broas is a lawyer with the Washington, D.C., firm Winston & Strawn, representing high-profile clients like UBS Securities and Papa John's International. 

He was previously appointed by Obama in 2010 to a trustee position with the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Health care mandate is tax, will negatively affect middle, lower class, some say

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Health care mandate is tax, will negatively affect middle, lower class, some say
Jun 29th 2012, 23:54

The Supreme Court decision made it official -- the health care mandate is a tax. That is a characterization one Senator says would have doomed its passage had it been known at the time.

"There would not have been ten votes for the legislation," South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said. "Nobody would have wanted to have gone home and say, 'I just increased your taxes by billions of dollars over the next 10 years to fix health care.'"

The administration preferred to use the word revenues, but it was clear taxpayers would have to cover the cost of the new law.

"We are insuring 30 million people who didn't have insurance before," Jimi Kessler of the centrist democratic think tank Third Way said. "That's going to cost some money."

But he notes with offsetting revenues from tax increases, "It's basically going to break even in terms of deficit." 

In the first 10 years, including four years before the law takes full effect, the administration plans to raise taxes more than 400 billion dollars -- on everything from tanning salons to medical devices and high-end insurance plans.

President Obama sold those tax increases by promising they would not hit most people.

"If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime," the President told a joint session of Congress in 2009.

Many of the taxes and penalties, however, will hit the middle class and below, such as the penalties on those who do not buy insurance.   

"Who's going to be uninsured?" Doug Holtz Eakin, former head of the Congressional Budget Office said. "People who are young and healthy, typically not super affluent. Poor people who simply can't afford insurance, so by and large that penalty tax is a tax on uninsured lower income Americans."    

The President also plans to cover the trillion dollar cost of the first 10 years with 500 billion dollar cuts to Medicare, which the program's chief actuary said would not work. Others explain that is because of a simple reason.

"The Medicare cuts are double counted,"  Jim Capretta, from the Ethics and Public Policy Center said. "They count toward supposedly paying for entitlement expansions under Obamacare, but they are also supposed to pay for future Medicare payments because the trust fund is going broke."

One part of the court's decision could push the costs of the health care law even higher. It said the administration could not force states to add some 17 million more people to Medicaid, making it possible to put many of them into the more expensive taxpayer-subsidized exchanges instead. And that, analysts say, could add some 500 billion dollars to the cost.

"Every time you spend a dollar you have to pay for it somehow. This is 500 billion new dollars,"  Holtz-Eakin said, adding that it would mean 500 billion in new taxes. 

All the cost and tax projections are just estimates.

Those who take the long view say whatever the nation does now, it has to focus on cost:

"We've completed  an 85-year quest to construct and perfect a safety net," Kessler said. "The next era for government, whether it's democratic or republican, is to find a way to afford that."

Beginning in 2014, the first 10 years of full implementation, the new health care law could cost as much as 2.6 trillion dollars. If any of the planned tax increases do not work, either other taxes go up, or the deficit does.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Senator introduces bill to rename Mount McKinley to Mount Denali

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Senator introduces bill to rename Mount McKinley to Mount Denali
Jun 29th 2012, 22:06

JUNEAU, Alaska –  U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski has introduced legislation to change the name of North America's tallest peak from Mount McKinley to Mount Denali.

It is the latest move in a decades-long fight over the name of the mountain, widely referred to as Denali by Alaskans.

For years, members of Ohio's congressional delegation have filed measures or included language in bills to retain the name Mount McKinley; Ohio is the birthplace of President William McKinley. One such measure is currently pending, introduced by U.S. Reps. Tim Ryan and Betty Sutton.

Murkowski said opponents of a name change can continue to refer to the peak as Mount McKinley. Under her bill, the Alaskan name for the mountain would become the "technically correct" term for what is an Alaska landmark, she said.

"Making Denali -- the name that Alaskans use anyway -- the official name of America's tallest mountain means something to Alaska," Murkowski told a subcommittee earlier this week.

Murkowski has also introduced legislation to rename the Talkeetna Ranger Station in Alaska for Walter Harper, credited as the first person to reach the peak's summit.

According to a National Park Service history, McKinley, the name bestowed on the peak by William Dickey in 1896, stuck because of his "'discovery' account" in the New York Sun in January 1897. This was in spite of the fact that Alaska Natives, Russians and American visitors had offered names of their own for the mountain over the years.

The name Denali is an Athabascan, or Alaska Native tribe, word meaning "the high one."

A move to change the name took hold in the 1970s, championed by then-Alaska Gov. Jay Hammond. The state Legislature, in 1975, passed a resolution urging the Interior secretary to direct the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to rename Mount McKinley as Mount Denali and Mount McKinley National Park to Denali National Park, according to the history.

Ohio U.S. Rep. Ralph Regula vowed to fight the name change, and did, through measures or language included in bills until his retirement in January 2009.

The park's name, however, eventually was changed to Denali National Park and Preserve.

Crystal Patterson, a spokeswoman for Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, said keeping the mountain's name is important to honor President McKinley. Patterson said Regula asked Ryan to continue the fight against a name change.

The Board on Geographic Names has taken the position that it won't address a geographic feature name pending before Congress. The board, comprised of representatives of some federal agencies, is involved in formally naming features and gets as many as 300 proposals a year to change a name or name an unnamed feature, the board's executive secretary, Lou Yost, said Friday.

The dispute over Mount McKinley is unusual, he said.

"Some names will cause some emotions and some consternation, but I don't think we've had any that have gone on this long, or (at) that high of a level," he said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: US confirms 1st ambassador to Burma in 22 years

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
US confirms 1st ambassador to Burma in 22 years
Jun 29th 2012, 20:39

The Senate has confirmed the appointment of the first U.S. ambassador to Burma in 22 years. Derek Mitchell has served as President Obama's special envoy to military-dominated Burma since August to encourage democratic reforms. 

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell welcomed Mitchell's confirmation which was done by voice vote Friday, saying his experience "will serve us well in the region." 

Mitchell served previously as a senior defense official for Asia-Pacific affairs. 

The U.S. is currently represented in Burma by a lower-level diplomat. Upgrading relations is part of U.S. efforts to bring Burma out of isolation after five decades of authoritarian rule. 

Burma will also send a full ambassador to Washington.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama administration considers turning Taliban detainees over to Afghanistan

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama administration considers turning Taliban detainees over to Afghanistan
Jun 29th 2012, 20:39

The Obama administration is considering a new gambit to restart peace talks with the Taliban in Afghanistan that would send several Taliban detainees from the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to a prison in Afghanistan, U.S. and Afghan officials told The Associated Press.

Under the proposal, some Taliban fighters or affiliates captured in the early days of the 2001 U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and later sent to Guantanamo under the label of enemy combatants would be transferred out of full U.S. control but not released. It's a leap of faith on the U.S. side that the men will not become threats to U.S. forces once back on Afghan soil. But it is meant to show more moderate elements of the Taliban insurgency that the U.S. is still interested in cutting a deal for peace.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and others have said that while negotiations with the Taliban are distasteful, they are the best way to settle the prolonged war.

The new compromise is intended to boost the credibility of the U.S.-backed Afghan government. President Hamid Karzai and U.S. officials are trying to draw the Taliban back to negotiations toward a peace deal between the national Afghan government and the Pashtun-based insurgency that would end a war U.S. commanders have said cannot be won with military power alone.

The Taliban have always been indifferent at best to negotiations with the Karzai government, saying the U.S. holds effective control in Afghanistan. The Obama administration has set a 2014 deadline to withdraw forces, and is trying to frame talks among the Afghans beforehand.

Under the new proposal, Guantanamo prisoners would go to a detention facility adjacent to Bagram air field, the largest U.S. military base in Afghanistan, officials of both governments said. The prison is inside the security perimeter established by the U.S. military, and is effectively under U.S. control for now. It is scheduled for transfer to full Afghan control in September.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta would have to sign off on the transfer and certify that the men did not pose a danger. He would not confirm details of the new proposal at a news conference Friday, but said discussions continue to try to promote a peace deal.

"Any prisoner exchanges I have to certify are going to abide by the law," Panetta said.

Any such transfer is unlikely to include the five most senior Taliban figures held at Guantanamo, the subjects of separate negotiations with the Taliban that have stalled, a senior U.S. official said.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the transfer is still under discussion and no offer has been made.

Afghan officials and other diplomats said it is not yet clear whether the new proposal could include those five, but said it has not been ruled out. Republicans in Congress bitterly opposed the plan to send those men to house arrest in Qatar, a Persian Gulf nation that has emerged as a key broker with the Muslim Taliban. The opponents feared the men would be set free and endanger the U.S.

The latest proposal was a topic of recent discussions in Washington with members of Karzai's peace committee, a group of elders charged with reaching out to the Taliban on the government's behalf.

"The possibility is strong," for a transfer to Afghanistan that includes the five top figures, said Ismail Qasemyar, international relations adviser for the Afghan High Peace Council.

Afghans involved in the discussions were still angling to get all 17 prisoners, including the five most senior men, released or transferred. The Taliban has demanded release of all the Guantanamo detainees as a condition for talks.

The Taliban abandoned direct talks in March, accusing the U.S. of reneging on several promises. The United States considers the talks suspended, not dead. The U.S. and the Afghan government are pursuing several new avenues to restart talks, including the use of proxy emissaries to the Taliban, diplomats said.

Karzai has long sought the return of all 17 Afghans imprisoned at Guantanamo, men he sometimes calls brothers, as a point of national pride. He has argued that their imprisonment at the detested Guantanamo prison undermines his credibility as a national leader, and that Afghanistan's own institutions should deal with captured insurgents.

The U.S. has said publicly that, in regards to the five senior Taliban, they would be transferred to another country's control, not released. But terms for the proposed transfer to Qatar were fairly loose. Officials briefed on the discussions said the men would have to agree not to return to fighting, forswear any ties to al-Qaida, and submit to a ban on their travel. Beyond that it was not clear how closely they would be controlled by the Qatar government.

The Taliban would have been asked to release Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the only U.S. prisoner of war from the Afghan conflict.

Qatar recently sent a letter to U.S. officials with proposals to rekindle talks, a U.S. official said, but it was not clear whether the new proposal for transfer to Afghanistan was among them.

The latest Bagram proposal would appeal to the Taliban, Qasemyar said.

"The High Peace Council could use that opportunity as a goodwill gesture," he said in an interview.

Qasemyar said that the proposal may have benefits for the U.S. beyond boosting his organization's bargaining power with the Taliban.

"What I gathered from what I heard in Washington is the U.S. government was afraid that if they released a prisoner and he went back to fighting," the Obama administration "would lose faith before the Congress or before the people of the United States," he said.

A way around that concern, Qasemyar said, is "to send them to the Afghan government. Then that responsibility would be shifted to our side."

Karzai supports the new proposal, Qasemyar said, despite some concern in the Afghan government that the five could become a rallying point for ethnic tension in Afghanistan.

Mullah Norullah Nori, for example, could be a problem for Karzai. He was a senior Taliban commander in Mazar-e-Sharif when the Taliban fought U.S. forces in late 2001. He previously was a Taliban governor in two provinces in Northern Afghanistan, where he has been accused of ordering the massacre of thousands of Shiite Muslims.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Senate OKs Obama's nuclear chief pick

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Senate OKs Obama's nuclear chief pick
Jun 29th 2012, 21:05

The Senate has approved President Obama's nominee to chair the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, an agency marked by discord in recent years.

Geologist Allison Macfarlane will replace Gregory Jaczko, who announced his resignation last month after a tumultuous three-year tenure. Jaczko came under fire for an unyielding management style that fellow commissioners and agency employees described as bullying.

Macfarlane, a Democrat, told a Senate panel this month that she will work to restore collegiality at the NRC. She also pledged to ensure "a respectful working environment" at the agency, which oversees safety at the nation's 104 commercial nuclear reactors. Her term runs through June 2013.

The Senate also approved Republican Kristine Svinicki to a new five-year term on the commission. Svinicki has served on the panel since 2008.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Congress extends flood insurance program covering 5.6 million

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Congress extends flood insurance program covering 5.6 million
Jun 29th 2012, 21:14

WASHINGTON –  Congress on Friday approved a 5-year extension to the National Flood Insurance Program, which covers 5.6 million people.

Failure to renew the program would have been a blow to the fragile housing market because potential homeowners in flood-susceptible areas would be unable to close on mortgages or refinance loans. A two-month lapse in the program in 2010 resulted in some 1,400 home sales a day being cancelled.

Congress created the flood insurance program in 1968 because few private insurers cover flood damage, leaving the government to cover the costs of disasters. Many of those covered by the program live in flood-prone areas where flood insurance is mandatory for those with mortgages from federally regulated lenders.

The program was generally self-sustaining until Hurricane Katrina and other hurricanes struck in 2005. The program now owes the Treasury nearly $18 billion dollars.

The plan approved Friday attempts to put the program on better financial footing by giving the government greater flexibility to raise rates. It also ends federal coverage for some properties, including vacation homes.

The flood insurance measure was included in a package of bills that also set federal transportation policy and prevent a doubling of interest rates for millions of college students.

It includes a provision by Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., that enlists the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to assess the nature of hurricane damage. After Katrina, private insurers tried to avoid paying claims for wind damage, saying that homes were destroyed by federally covered water damage.

It also moves to improve the floodplain mapping of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which runs the flood insurance program, and streamlines FEMA efforts to raise or move homes that are sources of repetitive claims to the insurance fund.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Some GOP-led states plan to resist health care law despite ruling

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Some GOP-led states plan to resist health care law despite ruling
Jun 29th 2012, 20:21

Leaders of the 26 states that challenged the federal health care law in court have one luxury with the outcome -- they can do nothing.

While the Supreme Court upheld the bulk of the Affordable Care Act, it did rein in the law's expansion of Medicaid by ruling that the federal government could not withhold Medicaid funds to those states that don't comply. The absence of any punitive measures means there is nothing to compel the governors or attorneys general to begin implementation of the law.

Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, for one, made clear his state will sit tight.

"We'll look to the fall and if there is a new president and a new Senate that's part of a Congress willing to change, that's the next step -- political," Walker said.

His voice was part of a quickly rising chorus of conservatives who took to the Internet and the airwaves raising political donations and rallying support for Mitt Romney's campaign after the ruling, in hopes of electing the candidate who vows to repeal the law. "If the American people don't want ObamaCare, it's a political issue and it's about this fall's presidential race," said GOP Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback.

One health care lobbyist told Fox News that even if states wanted to implement the provision in the Affordable Care Act, they couldn't.

The provisions require staffing levels that do not exist and do not have funding, the lobbyist said, adding it would take years to iron out the specifics needed to put the law into action. "It can't work the way it's on the books right now. Part of that is that there is so much haze within the act," said Robert Slayton of the Illinois Association of Health Care Underwriters.

The "haze" comes from 2,700 pages of legal language in the act. Those pages contain provisions that have yet to see the light of day. When the public and the health care industry learn the requirements of those provisions, inevitably they may conflict with the interests of the states. That means new legal challenges are sure to follow. "You'll see a dozen more battles in the coming years ... and some of them will be in the Supreme Court," said Anup Malani, health law expert at the University of Chicago.

Slayton said the Affordable Care Act does not live up to its name and only addresses one of the problems with health care -- access.

But President Obama, in celebrating the court's decision Thursday, called the ruling a "victory" for the American people and said he would not re-fight the political battle over the law.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Clooney to raise money for Obama in Geneva

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Clooney to raise money for Obama in Geneva
Jun 29th 2012, 19:52

Actor George Clooney is offering more help to President Obama's re-election campaign by headlining a European fundraiser this summer for Americans living abroad. 

An invitation posted on Obama's campaign website says Clooney will be the special guest at an Obama fundraiser in Geneva, Switzerland, on Aug. 27. 

Tickets start at $1,000 per person, and dinner for two costs a cool $30,000. 

Clooney held a gala fundraiser at his Los Angeles home in May that raised nearly $15 million. 

He typically spends time during the summer at his villa on Italy's Lake Como. 

Obama's campaign has held fundraising events overseas to raise money from U.S. citizens living abroad.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Haley cleared of ethics charges, still faces questions over husband's Facebook post

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Haley cleared of ethics charges, still faces questions over husband's Facebook post
Jun 29th 2012, 18:34

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley was cleared of ethics charges Friday for the second time in two months, though her family continues to deal with a separate controversy after her military husband took to Facebook to call state lawmakers "cowards." 

The House Ethics Committee on Friday cleared Haley of charges she illegally lobbied while a member of the House. 

Haley's attorney Butch Bowers said the verdict ends the matter and shows Haley's conduct was appropriate. Haley issued a statement saying she is pleased with the results. 

"The Ethics Committee did its job thoroughly, professionally and well," she said. "It's just a shame that our judicial and legislative bodies have had to waste so much of their time on phony political charges that never had any evidence behind them or any basis in fact." 

Haley had testified she did nothing wrong in her previous jobs as a fundraiser for Lexington Medical Center's nonprofit and as a consultant for engineering firm Wilbur Smith Associates. 

But there's another matter hanging over the Haleys -- that would be husband Michael Haley's Facebook post last week slamming lawmakers for not voting on a government restructuring bill the governor favored. 

Michael Haley, who is an officer in the South Carolina National Guard, posted the item last Thursday, after the Senate failed to vote on a bill backed by his wife that would restructure portions of the state government. 

"It amazes me that in a week that we have heroes who have died fighting for our freedoms, we have cowards who are afraid to take a vote in the senate," Haley wrote. 

Earlier that day, the Guard announced that three state soldiers had been killed in an attack by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan. 

The governor, in response to calls that her husband apologize, defended him by saying he is a "citizen" and "has the right to get frustrated." 

But Lexington Republican Sen. Jake Knotts, a frequent opponent of the governor, suggested Tuesday that Michael Haley's action had violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. 

"I'm concerned when a person uses his uniform or position in the military for political purposes," Knotts said. He said the Facebook post was "an insult to the families and to the Senate as a whole." 

He said Haley should offer apologies to both the soldiers' families and to the Senate, and he asked Maj. Gen. Robert Livingston, head of the state's National Guard, to look into the matter. 

Livingston has since said he will conduct an internal review of the Guard's policy on social media use. 

Livingston said he spoke with Michael Haley about the matter, and Haley told the general he intended to express himself as a private citizen, not as a member of the Guard. 

On Monday, state Sen. Phil Leventis said on the floor of the Senate that Michael Haley's comment amounted to politics at its worst. He said he didn't think the three soldiers died for a new South Carolina Department of Administration. 

"I found it difficult that Mr. Haley implied that he knew what those three wanted. They died as Americans. They didn't die as Republicans or Democrats," said Leventis, a Democrat who retired as a brigadier general in the South Carolina Air National Guard after 30 years in uniform. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama sees Kentucky mom who lost legs shielding child from tornado

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama sees Kentucky mom who lost legs shielding child from tornado
Jun 29th 2012, 17:05

A Kentucky woman who lost her legs shielding her children from a tornado has walked into the Oval Office arm-in-arm with President Obama. 

The visit by Stephanie Decker came less than four months after the March twister wrecked her home in Henryville, Ky. She had tied a blanket around the children and thrown herself on top of them when falling debris crushed her legs. 

The 37-year-old Decker now walks some of the time using prosthetic limbs. She was accompanied to the White House on Friday by her husband, Joe, and their two children. 

Decker visited with Obama before he left to survey fire damage in Colorado. She says they discussed an improved prosthetic model, and a foundation she started to train children with artificial limbs to play sports.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Supreme Court won't hear `wardrobe malfunction' appeal

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Supreme Court won't hear `wardrobe malfunction' appeal
Jun 29th 2012, 18:06

The Supreme Court decided Friday not to consider reinstating the government's $550,000 fine on CBS for Janet Jackson's infamous breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction" at the 2004 Super Bowl. 

The high court refused to hear an appeal from the Federal Communications Commission over the penalty. 

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice had thrown out the fine. The second time came after the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television. 

The appeals court said FCC's policy of excusing fleeting instances of indecent words and images appeared to change without notice in March 2004, a month after Jackson's halftime act. The judges said that made the agency's action against CBS "arbitrary and capricious." 

But now, the FCC clearly has abandoned its exception for fleeting expletives, Chief Justice John Roberts said. 

"It is now clear that the brevity of an indecent broadcast -- be it word or image -- cannot immunize it from FCC censure," he said. "Any future `wardrobe malfunctions' will not be protected on the ground relied on by the court below." 

In addition, Roberts said that calling it a "wardrobe malfunction" when Justin Timberlake ripped away part of Jackson's bustier "strained the credulity of the public." 

CBS said it was grateful for the court's decision. 

"At every major turn of this process, the lower courts have sided with us," the network said in a statement. "And now that the Supreme Court has brought this matter to a close, we look forward to the FCC heeding the call for the very balanced enforcement which was the hallmark of the commission for many, many years."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.