FOXNews.com: Administration to pay legal fees for contractors that don't issue sequestration warnings

FOXNews.com FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com

Administration to pay legal fees for contractors that don't issue sequestration warnings Sep 29th 2012, 19:40 The Obama administration has issue further guidelines for defense contractors facing layoffs over sequestration that include the promise of legal compensation for employee disputes, drawing renewed accusations from congressional Republicans about trying to conceal the full, potential impact of the looming situation. The memorandum issued Friday restated the Labor Department's position from July that contractors should not issue written notices to employees because of the "uncertainty" over the across-the-board cuts to the defense budget and other federal spending that will occur Jan. 2 unless Congress reaches a new deal. The notices are required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and generally require employers with more than 100 employees to provide 60-day notices of "mass layoffs if they are reasonably foreseeable." "For the second time, the Obama administration has now encouraged government contractors to ignore the WARN Act and hold off on warning employees about possible layoffs due to the looming sequestration cuts," Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. and lead author of the Sequestration Transparency Act, said Friday. "Even more astonishing, the administration today told contractors that the government would cover legal costs that could result from ignoring the law. Rather than work with congressional Republicans to avert these devastating military cuts that threaten our national defense, the Obama administration is trying to confuse the public on the eve of an election." The projected $500 billion in Pentagon cuts under the so-called sequestration will occur because Congress failed to agree on a deficit-reduction plan this summer. The guidance issued by the Labor Department this summer stated "it is neither necessary nor appropriate" for federal contractors to issue the warnings. The memorandum issued Friday states the federal government would cover employee compensation under the WARN Act – "irrespective of the outcome" as long as the contractor follows the Labor Department guidelines. Still, defense contractor Lockheed Martin -- which might have to lay off employees should the cuts kick in -- is still considering whether to send out the notices, according to The Hill newspaper. Rep. John Kline, chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, suggested last week that the Labor Department is trying to conceal the full impact of the cuts.  "The Labor Department is trying to hide the consequences of sequestration from workers," Kline, R-Minn., said in a letter to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis. The letter was the second in two months by Republican committee leaders in which they asked for an update and more detailed information about the obligations federal contractors have in giving the advanced notice. On Friday, Republican Sens. John McCain, Ariz.; Lindsey Graham, S.C.; and Kelly Ayotte, N.H., issued a similar statement, saying in part, "The president should insist that companies act in accordance with the clearly stated law and move forward with the layoff notices." The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions