The editor of the Des Moines Register complained this week that President Obama's team had "handcuffed" his newspaper's editorial board by insisting that a 30-minute conversation with the president be kept off the record.
Obama spoke with editors of the influential Iowa newspaper Tuesday morning, as part of his effort to win the paper's endorsement -- a decision set to be announced this weekend.
But editor Rick Green, in an unusual column published later that day, revealed that the White House had demanded the conversation be kept out of print. Green said Obama's aides did not give a reason for the "unusual condition" of the call.
"It was a 'personal call' to the Register's publisher and editor, we were told," Green wrote. "The specifics of the conversation could not be shared because it was off-the-record."
Green went on to say the newspaper "immediately lobbied his campaign staff in Des Moines for a formal, on-the-record call" but was told the decision "came from the White House."
"We relented and took the call. How could we not? It's the leader of the free world on line one. And as we weigh with our editorial board this critical decision about who to endorse, it was necessary for us to discuss the challenges confronting our state, nation and world with the president -- even when handcuffed by rules related to what could be shared," Green said.
Green noted that Mitt Romney met with the editorial board "literally" in a barn in Iowa on Oct. 9, and the audio from that conversation was posted online.
Because the Obama conversation was off-record, it's unclear whether anything was discussed that the president would have reason not to want released. But Green, in an email he sent to a campaign spokesman and published Tuesday, seemed to suggest there was nothing in the conversation Obama shouldn't want shared.
"I know how one slip-up could lead to a (news) cycle-changing 'gotcha.' But you and I both know Iowa is coming down to the wire and the polls are incredibly close," Green wrote. "What the President shared with us this morning -- and the manner, depth and quality of his presentation - would have been well-received by not only his base, but also undecideds. From a voter standpoint, keeping it off-the-record was a disservice."
Green said the snub, though, would not impact the newspaper's decision on an endorsement.
"That would be petty and ridiculous. We take far too seriously what's at stake this election and what our endorsement should say," he wrote.
0 comments:
Post a Comment