FOXNews.com: Lawmakers call House Republicans' 'no budget, no pay' plan 'unconstitutional'

FOXNews.com FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com

Lawmakers call House Republicans' 'no budget, no pay' plan 'unconstitutional' Jan 21st 2013, 20:55 House Republicans are touting a new plan for temporarily resolving the debt ceiling standoff and passing a bona fide budget for the first time in years. But lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are claiming there's a problem – it's unconstitutional. In an effort to break the partisan deadlock, GOP leaders on Friday unveiled an ultimatum aimed at the Democratic-controlled Senate. The plan, dubbed "no budget, no pay," allows the government to get three more months of borrowing authority, with no immediate spending cuts required, in exchange for having to pass a budget within that time. If senators fails to do so, they will be denied federal pay. "We will authorize a three-month temporary debt limit increase to give the Senate and House time to pass a budget," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said. "Furthermore, if the Senate or House fails to pass a budget in that time, members of Congress will not be paid by the American people for failing to do their job." In selling the idea, House Speaker John Boehner called the Senate's failure to pass a budget over the last four years "shameful." "Before there is any long-term debt limit increase, a budget should be passed that cuts spending," he said. But the idea – which has not yet been formally presented – is already drawing criticism from some Democrats and Republicans, who claim the provision on pay violates the Constitution.  The 27th Amendment states that: "No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened." "I understand the sentiment behind 'no budget, no pay,'" Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Monday, but "it appears that the 27th Amendment does not permit Congress to alter its pay in the midst of a current session." "We just started the 113th Congress, effectively meaning that we would not be able to alter our pay or wouldn't be able to take effect until 2015," Jeffries told Fox News. "Even if this was presented, it would render it meaningless in terms of the effect it's intended to have." Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., was quoted as saying the plan is "unconstitutional" in an article published Friday by Roll Call. But in a later statement sent to Fox News, the Republican lawmaker clarified his position, saying, "I strongly support the House Republican leadership's proposal to link the debt ceiling increase to passage of a budget by the Senate, which has gone 1360 days without passing a blueprint for federal spending. "While the 27th Amendment prohibits Congress from varying its own pay within a given Congress, as I noted in my interview it can certainly withhold pay," said Issa, who presides as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. "I expect the final proposal brought before the House will have resolved any constitutional questions and that it will have my support." Votes from Democrats may be necessary to pass it, if Republican conservatives who oppose any increase in the debt limit withhold their support. The White House said it's "encouraged" by the apparent willingness to extend the debt limit. And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also welcomed the development -- but his office is indicating that Senate Democrats won't accept it because of the measure on congressional pay. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions